Equal treatment
The principle of equal treatment requires that all tenderers are treated equally throughout the entire procurement procedure. This fundamental principle prohibits discrimination and requires that comparable situations are treated in the same way. Violations regularly lead to suspension or annulment of award decisions.
A concession bid of 99.8% — and nobody checked whether it was calculated on the same basis as the competitors
The Council of State suspends the award of the parking concession of the city of Ath because the winner calculated its royalty percentage on costs including VAT, while the competitors did so on costs excluding VAT — two incomparable bases for the same award criterion.
An ordinal scale with scores to two decimal places: here 'intermediate values allowed' becomes a smokescreen for undisclosed sub-sub-criteria
Zorgbedrijf Antwerpen scores bids for a Menu Management System on an ordinal 50/55/70/85/100% scale with 'intermediate values allowed', but the evaluation report produces scores to the hundredth — which can only be explained by a hidden split into sub-sub-award criteria that appears nowhere in the specifications.
MDD Pharma was allowed to 'clarify' daily delivery into weekly — Multipharma wasn't allowed to fix its 'forbidden variant'. Two weights, equal treatment thrown out
Ixelles' public welfare centre lets one bidder convert daily delivery into weekly after a 'request for clarification', but denies another bidder the chance to fix a similar irregularity — without explaining why the two situations differ.
What if the Council of State annuls a Royal Decree six days before your contract award?
The Council of State suspends a re-awarded public contract because the Province of Liège withdrew its first award to Onefield ICT and reassigned it to a competitor after the retroactive annulment of the Royal Decree on accreditation classes, without first inviting the bidder to rely on the capacity of an affiliated group company.
If two of three bidders had to fix their offers, 'a number of offers had irregularities' is not a motivation
The Council of State suspends the award of lot 6 of De Watergroep's framework agreement for grounds maintenance because the award report only mentioned that 'a number of offers' had been regularised, without specifying which bidders, which issues, and what the outcome was — while in fact two of the three bidders had received regularisation requests.
Incumbent scores 18/20 on 'creativity', challenger 8/20 — yet no unfair advantage, says Council of State
The Council of State holds that a 10-point gap on 20 for 'creativity and originality' between the incumbent service provider and the challenger is not unlawful, because the tender documents explicitly asked for a moodboard 'based on the current magazine' and the existing publication was publicly available online to all bidders.
'Our subcontractor has nearly 60 years of experience' does not justify a paint output of 135 m²/day
The Council of State rejects COMABAT's suspension request because the social housing company Sambre et Biesme rightly found the offered paint prices abnormally low: the subcontractor's claimed output of 135 m²/day was more than double what both an internal technical manager and an independent architect considered realistic.
STIB reserves a 60,000-case debt collection contract for bailiffs — but forgets to prove why collection agencies couldn't do it
The Council of State suspends STIB's decision not to select a debt collection company for a framework agreement on debt recovery, because STIB exclusively reserved the market for bailiff offices without adequately justifying why this restriction of competition was warranted.
Wrong account on e-Procurement? If the entire application makes clear who the candidate is, the authority cannot remain blind
The Council of State suspends the non-selection of a candidate who uploaded its participation request through the e-Procurement account of a sister company, because the entirety of the submitted documents and the provided clarification unambiguously showed who the actual candidate was.
Fail to correct the same errors through three offer rounds? The authority doesn't have to give you a fourth chance
The Council of State rejects the claim by Sopra Steria and IDEMIA against their exclusion from an €80 million contract for a biometric identification system for the police, because they kept repeating the same irregularities after three offer rounds and repeated regularization requests.
Minister Defensie sloot de Havilland uit van defensieaanbesteding zonder objectieve selectiecriteria
Schorsing omdat de minister de kandidatuur van De Havilland weigerde zonder helder criteria of objectieve gronden, in strijd met gelijkheid.
Agence du Numérique evalueerde cybersecurity-services zonder transparante gunningsmethodologie
Schorsing was gerechtvaardigd omdat de methode voor evaluatie van de cyberincident-responders ondoorzichtig was en verschillende inschrijvers niet gelijk werden behandeld.
Stad Brussel schendt zorgvuldigheidsbeginsel bij prijs- en kostenonderzoek voor asfalteringswerken
De Raad vernietigde de gunningsbeslissing omdat de stad ten onrechte geen zorgvuldig prijsonderzoek uitvoerde: zij verhoogde het wettelijk afwijkingspercentage van 15% naar 25%, waardoor geen prijsbevraging bij de gekozen inschrijver plaatsvond.
20 points for 2% of the contract value: how a skewed scoring system and exclusive negotiations sank a €6 million vaccination security contract
The Council of State annuls the award of all nine lots of a security contract for Walloon vaccination centres to Securitas, because the Walloon health agency negotiated exclusively with Securitas and used an absurdly disproportionate scoring system where a €10,000 post carried half the weight of a €6 million post.
One-hour emergency response for Christmas lights in Jette — but the authority forgot to check if that was realistic
The Council of State suspends the award of a holiday illumination contract in Jette because the authority failed to verify whether the one-hour intervention time offered by two tenderers was realistic, despite multiple red flags — including the fact that the offer was submitted by a different legal entity than the one to whom the contract was awarded.
A subcontracting agreement without a date and without a price — but with a clear commitment to perform the work
The Council of State suspends the City of Kortrijk's decision to exclude a tender as substantially irregular because the subcontracting agreement with the ISO 17025-certified subcontractor was undated and contained no price, while the agreement did contain a clear commitment to perform the relevant part of the contract.
Authority may not deviate from interpretation used by its mandatary during negotiations
When a mandated entity applies a particular interpretation of tender conditions during negotiations, the contracting authority may not depart from it in the award decision without giving candidates the opportunity to submit a new offer.
The e-Procurement platform sends a wrong deadline — the authority excludes the tender but forgets to examine the consequences of its own error
The Council of State annuls Nautisport's decision to exclude a tender for late submission, because the delay was caused by an erroneous deadline on the e-Procurement platform and the authority failed to examine the consequences of that error in light of the equality and proportionality principles.
Annulment action rejected: all five grounds against award of lot 2 restoration works at Collégiale Sainte Croix in Liège dismissed – contracting authority's discretion respected, no irregularities in chosen tenderer's offer, stone choice and inter-lot collaboration are valid award criteria
The Council of State rejected the annulment action by Monument Hainaut SA against the award by the City of Liège of lot 2 (masonry) of the restoration works on the exterior envelope of the Collégiale Sainte Croix to the temporary association Galère-Liégeois, after all five grounds were dismissed: the regularity check was adequately motivated, the site installation outside designated 'available zones' was not an irregularity, the missing calculation note concerned the execution phase rather than the tender, the time-lapse was a valid photographic report, and the award criteria (stone choice, inter-lot collaboration, presentation quality) were linked to the contract's subject matter.
Suspension of award of framework agreement for housing restoration – contracting authority valued prior references and certificates of the chosen tenderer under quality criterion while specifications only provided for 'means for optimal execution' as award criterion, in violation of Article 81 of the 2016 Act and transparency principle
The Council of State suspended under extreme urgency the award by SRL Sambre & Biesme of a works framework agreement (restoration of occupied and unoccupied dwellings) to SA SOTRELCO, because the contracting authority in assessing the second award criterion (quality, 30%) had valued SOTRELCO's prior references and certificates of satisfactory execution, while this information did not correspond to the 'means to be deployed for optimal execution' as described in the specifications — tenderers could not understand from the specifications that their prior achievements, which typically belong to qualitative selection, would be taken into account under this award criterion.
Dropping mandatory options after the BAFO without warning — and reversing the ranking
The Council of State suspends the award of a renovation contract because the CPAS dropped mandatory options (triple glazing, ecological materials, single-flux ventilation) after receiving BAFOs without informing tenderers during negotiations, thereby reversing the ranking to the detriment of the applicant.
0.5% screening threshold in price investigation passes legality test
A contracting authority may apply a weight threshold during price investigation to select non-negligible items, provided the threshold is carefully established and stays within the bounds of reasonableness.
Picking up litter at 6.8 km/h — the tenderer promises it, but the authority doesn't buy it
The Council of State rejects the suspension request of a highway maintenance contractor whose offer was excluded for abnormal pricing, because the proposed productivity — 163 km of litter picking in three days, or 6.8 km/h while walking and bending — is prima facie unrealistic.
The turnover requirement for the July 21st celebrations triples — but the authority forgets to explain why
The Council of State annuls the specifications for organizing the Belgian National Day festivities because the State tripled the financial capacity requirement — from €2M cumulative over three years to €2M per year for each of the last three years — without adequately justifying why this increase was proportionate to the contract.
Annulment of award for energy renovation experts (INTERREG RENOVALT) – IFAPME allowed chosen tenderer to improve offer by requesting additional details on award criterion without giving same opportunity to other tenderer (violation of equal treatment)
The Council of State annulled IFAPME's award of lot 1 (Walloon side) of the contract for energy renovation experts under the INTERREG RENOVALT project to SM POLY-TECH, because IFAPME asked only POLY-TECH to detail its offer for the five sub-activities of the qualitative award criterion (technical-pedagogical competences) in violation of the equal treatment principle, while SM ST.AR.TECH was not given the same opportunity, and the precisions obtained contained new elements that were positively assessed.
Het toelaten van prijskortingen bij combinaties van percelen is geen wezenlijke bestekwijziging — en een trager vergroeningsritme dan de LEZ-regelgeving mogelijk voorschrijft, maakt een offerte niet automatisch onregelmatig
De Raad van State verwerpt het beroep tot nietigverklaring van de gunning van een opdracht voor de exploitatie en vergroening van geregeld busvervoer (West 1, zestien percelen), omdat (1) het invoeren van een 'combinatiemogelijkheid' voor percelen vanaf de derde bestekversie geen wezenlijke wijziging was maar het louter expliciteren van de bestaande mogelijkheid tot prijskorting bij meerdere percelen op grond van artikel 58 KB speciale sectoren, (2) de offerte van de gekozen inschrijver voor het Gentse perceel niet substantieel onregelmatig was wegens de LEZ-regelgeving — nu de regelgeving uitdrukkelijk in een systeem van individuele toelatingen voorziet voor de periode 2027-2030 en niet vaststaat dat na 2030 geen toelatingen meer mogelijk zijn, (3) de aanbestedende overheid een omstandig prijsonderzoek heeft gevoerd dat het prijsverschil van 36,5% afdoende verklaarde door verschillen in financieringsmodel, infrastructuurkosten en vergroeningsritme, zonder dat een bijzonder onderzoek naar abnormale prijzen vereist was, (4) de vorming van een tijdelijke maatschap door zeven geselecteerde entiteiten uit dezelfde groep rechtsgeldig was en geen mededingingsbeperkende handeling inhield, en (5) het beweerde belangenconflict in hoofde van de CEO van de moedergroep van de gekozen inschrijver — tevens voorzitter van de sectorfederatie — niet verder kwam dan loutere beweringen en veronderstellingen.
Een bestek dat monopolietaken van gerechtsdeurwaarders opneemt in het prijscriterium is fundamenteel onwettig — en een bevraging achteraf kan dat gebrek niet verhelpen
De Raad van State vernietigt de gunning van een opdracht voor debiteurenbeheer via een gerechtsdeurwaarder, omdat het bestek de monopoliebevoegdheden van gerechtsdeurwaarders — waarvoor wettelijk vastgestelde tarieven gelden die niet aan prijsconcurrentie mogen worden onderworpen — opnam in de inventaris die diende als basis voor het gunningscriterium prijs, en de aanbestedende overheid bij de beoordeling van dat criterium vervolgens afweek van het bestek door de inventarisprijzen te vervangen door het resultaat van een informele bevraging over de 'minnelijke fase' — een begrip dat niet in het bestek voorkwam — waardoor de inschrijvers bij het opstellen van hun offerte niet konden voorzien hoe het prijscriterium zou worden beoordeeld.
Handtekeningen op verbintenisverklaringen van derden die niet overeenstemmen met de identiteitskaart mogen als onbewijskrachtig worden geweigerd — en de aanbestedende overheid hoeft de inschrijver geen tweede kans te geven
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing bij uiterst dringende noodzakelijkheid van de niet-selectie van een inschrijver bij een raamovereenkomst voor loodgieterswerken, omdat (1) de aanbestedende overheid de verbintenisverklaringen van twee onderaannemers als onbewijskrachtig mocht weigeren wegens niet-overeenstemmende handtekeningen met hun identiteitskaart — wat geen schending is van de bewijskracht van een onderhandse akte maar een vaststelling dat de verklaringen de beweerde verbintenissen niet aantonen, (2) de formele motivering afdoende was nu zij de concrete reden van de weigering vermeldde, en (3) de zorgvuldigheidsplicht de aanbestedende overheid niet verplichtte om de inschrijver nogmaals te bevragen nadat zij reeds gebruik had gemaakt van de mogelijkheid om aanvullende informatie op te vragen na de opening van de offertes.
Een groot prijsverschil alleen volstaat niet om een bijzonder onderzoek naar abnormale prijzen te verplichten — en vertrouwelijkheid rechtvaardigt dat de details van een prijstoelichting niet in het gunningsverslag staan
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing bij uiterst dringende noodzakelijkheid van de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor reisdiensten, omdat (1) de aanbestedende overheid wel degelijk een algemeen prijsonderzoek heeft gevoerd — met een interne prijsvergelijking en een gerichte bevraging van de twee scherpst biedende inschrijvers — en na afdoende toelichting terecht kon concluderen dat geen sprake was van schijnbaar abnormale prijzen, (2) het loutere bestaan van een groot prijsverschil (57%) tussen offertes niet automatisch de verplichting doet ontstaan om over te gaan tot een bijzonder onderzoek naar abnormale prijzen, nu de aanbestedende overheid een ruime beoordelingsvrijheid heeft — zeker bij intellectuele diensten — en het feit dat de gekozen inschrijver als zittende dienstverlener haar scherpere prijzen kon verantwoorden met franchisewijzigingen, omzetstijging en technologische optimalisatie, en (3) de gekozen inschrijver haar offerte niet onrechtmatig had gewijzigd door afzonderlijke tarieven voor online en offline boekingen op te geven, nu het bestek zelf die mogelijkheid voorzag bij de omschrijving van het gunningscriterium 'online boekingssysteem'.
De aanwijzing van een voorkeurbieder in een onderhandelingsprocedure voor treinstellen van 3,3 miljard euro doorstaat de toets — ook al scoort de goedkoopste inschrijver technisch lager en ook al is de beoordelingsmethode pas na opening van de offertes uitgewerkt
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing bij uiterst dringende noodzakelijkheid van de tweede gunningsbeslissing voor een raamovereenkomst voor de levering van elektrische en batterijelektrische treinstellen (AM30) ter waarde van meer dan 3,3 miljard euro, omdat (1) de aanbestedende overheid na een eerdere succesvolle schorsing de motivering van het technisch criterium afdoende heeft verbeterd, (2) de beoordelingsmethode — een plus/min-waardensysteem voor het technisch criterium — niet vooraf in de opdrachtdocumenten hoefde te worden aangekondigd, mits zij coherent is en de gunningscriteria niet denatureert (toepassing TNS Dimarso), (3) de keuze om na vier onderhandelingsrondes over te gaan tot aanwijzing van een voorkeurbieder in plaats van een vijfde onderhandelingsronde niet kennelijk onredelijk is, (4) de beweerde specifieke beoordelingsfouten bij de technische, contractuele en energiecriteria het puntenverschil niet overbruggen, en (5) het argument dat de aanbestedende overheid de uitsluitingsgronden had moeten onderzoeken wegens de activiteiten van de gekozen inschrijver in bezet Palestijns gebied prematuur is, nu de bestreden beslissing slechts een voorkeurbieder aanwijst en geen definitieve gunning inhoudt.
Een inschrijver die zelf 'niet conform' invult voor een essentiële eis, kan achteraf niet beweren dat hij wél kon voldoen — en een bestek dat aansluit bij eerdere voertuigen is niet automatisch op maat van de zittende inschrijver geschreven
De Raad van State verwerpt het beroep tot nietigverklaring van de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor de levering van multifunctionele brandweerautopompen 4x4, omdat (1) de verzoekende partij zelf in haar offerte uitdrukkelijk 'NEEN' had ingevuld bij de conformiteitsvereiste van drie scharnierpunten voor opstaptreden — met de opmerking 'dit is een zinloze eis om bepaalde firma's te bevoordelen' — en de aanbestedende overheid haar offerte terecht als substantieel onregelmatig heeft verklaard, (2) de verzoekende partij er niet in slaagt aan te tonen dat het bestek op maat van de zittende inschrijver is geschreven, nu zij zelf voor het merendeel van de technische vereisten 'conform' had kunnen aanbieden en de driescharniereneis voortkwam uit concrete operationele ervaringen van de brandweer, (3) de looptijd van zes jaar voor de raamovereenkomst afdoende was gemotiveerd in de toelichtingsnota aan de Inspectie van Financiën — met verwijzing naar de hoge investeringskosten voor prototypebouw en de productietermijn van anderhalf tot twee jaar — en die motivering niet in het bestek zelf hoefde te staan, en (4) het middel inzake machtsafwending faalt bij gebrek aan ernstige en met elkaar overeenstemmende aanwijzingen.
Zusterarrest autopompen 4x2: bewust niet-conform inschrijven bij essentiële eis leidt onvermijdelijk tot substantiële onregelmatigheid
In dit zusterarrest van arrest 264.262 — met dezelfde partijen, dezelfde opdracht maar voor perceel 1 (autopompen 4x2) — verwerpt de Raad van State het beroep tot nietigverklaring op identieke gronden: de inschrijver die zelf uitdrukkelijk 'niet conform' invulde bij de essentiële eis van drie scharnierpunten voor opstaptreden, met de opmerking dat dit 'een zinloze eis is om bepaalde firma's te bevoordelen', kan achteraf niet beweren dat zij wél had kunnen voldoen, en het bestek is niet op maat van de zittende inschrijver geschreven nu de betwiste eis voortkwam uit concrete operationele ervaringen van de brandweer.
De beoordelingsmethode voor gunningscriteria hoeft niet vooraf te worden bekendgemaakt — en een beschrijvende beoordelingsschaal met vijf niveaus is niet onregelmatig
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing van de gunning van een overheidsopdracht voor werken (renovatie industrieel gebouw en aanleg bedrijvenpark), omdat (1) de beoordelingsmethode — een beschrijvende vijfpuntenschaal — niet vooraf in de opdrachtdocumenten hoefde te worden aangekondigd, mits zij coherent is, de gunningscriteria niet denatureert en geen discriminerend effect heeft (bevestiging van het TNS Dimarso-arrest), (2) de aanbestedende overheid de planningen van de inschrijvers mocht corrigeren om de vergelijkbaarheid te waarborgen door de startdatum te verschuiven naar het moment waarop daadwerkelijk op de werf wordt gewerkt, (3) het aspect 'organisatie' — waaronder het beheer van hinder in een stedelijke omgeving — duidelijk in het bestek was aangekondigd als beoordelingselement, en de inschrijver dit in haar offerte niet had behandeld, en (4) de aanbestedende overheid niet verplicht was om de inschrijver te vragen haar offerte op dit punt aan te vullen — dat zou een substantiële verbetering zijn geweest die het gelijkheidsbeginsel zou schenden.
Bij een globale beoordeling van technische waarde mag de aanbestedende overheid de vastgestelde meer- en minwaarden cijfermatig vertalen naar een score — en na vier offerterondes mag zij een voorkeursbieder aanwijzen zonder verder te onderhandelen
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing van de aanwijzing van CAF als voorkeursbieder voor de NMBS-raamovereenkomst voor nieuwe treinstellen (AM30), omdat (1) de beoordelingsmethode voor het criterium 'Technische waarde' — een beginscore van 18/36 met bijstelling van 0,1 punt per vastgestelde meer- of minwaarde — zich inpaste in de vooraf aangekondigde globale beoordeling en geen nieuw systeem was maar een nadere invulling na het eerdere schorsingsarrest, (2) de beoordelingselementen niet als subgunningscriteria waren gehanteerd omdat zij niet elk afzonderlijk waren gewogen, (3) de NMBS na vier offerterondes over twee jaar mocht beslissen een voorkeursbieder aan te wijzen in plaats van verder te onderhandelen, nu zij aannemelijk maakte dat verdere rondes ernstige negatieve gevolgen zouden hebben (70-100 miljoen euro OPEX-kosten, vertraging tot na 2030) terwijl het onzeker was of de offertes nog konden verbeteren, en (4) een nieuw middel dat pas op de dag van de terechtzitting schriftelijk werd ingediend, niet-ontvankelijk was wegens schending van de loyale procesvoering — ook al werd het aangebracht als middel van openbare orde.
Wanneer een inschrijver in zijn inventaris een streepje plaatst in plaats van een prijs, moet de formele motivering van de gunningsbeslissing het volledige onderzoek weerspiegelen — niet alleen het eindresultaat
De Raad van State schorst de gunning van een dienstenopdracht voor de exploitatie van een radiodispatching, omdat de formele motivering van de gunningsbeslissing ontoereikend is: de aanbestedende overheid stelde dat de gekozen inschrijver een prijs van 0 euro had ingediend voor een transitiepost die zij als zittende operator niet nodig had, terwijl uit het administratief dossier bleek dat de inventaris slechts een streepje bevatte — een wezenlijk verschil dat de aanbestedende overheid voor de keuze plaatste tussen een materiële fout (artikel 34 KB 18/04/2017) en een substantiële onregelmatigheid (artikel 76 KB 18/04/2017), zonder dat dit onderzoek in de motivering tot uiting kwam.
De correlatie tussen de aangeboden prijs en de diepgang van het plan van aanpak mag worden betrokken bij de kwalitatieve beoordeling — en het niet-abnormaal bevinden van de prijs staat daar niet aan in de weg
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing van de gunning van een studieopdracht voor walstroom in een zeehaven, omdat (1) de aanbestedende overheid uit de correlatie tussen de lage prijs en het voorgestelde plan van aanpak mocht afleiden dat de studie met onvoldoende diepgang zou worden aangepakt — zonder daarmee de autonomie van de gunningscriteria te schenden — en (2) de vaststelling dat de prijs niet abnormaal is, niet tegenstrijdig is met de vaststelling dat het plan van aanpak onvoldoende diepgang vertoont: de prijs was normaal voor de voorgestelde aanpak, maar de aanpak zelf was ontoereikend.
Een aanbestedende overheid kan niet op grond van artikel 85 van de Overheidsopdrachtenwet afzien van een opdracht die reeds in uitvoeringsfase is getreden — ook niet als de formele kennisgeving ontbreekt
De Raad van State schorst de beslissing van een gemeente om de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor periodieke controles in te trekken en af te zien van de opdracht, omdat de opdracht op het ogenblik van die beslissing reeds in een fase van uitvoering was getreden — er was een startbevel gegeven, er waren meer dan tachtig controles uitgevoerd — en artikel 85 van de Overheidsopdrachtenwet enkel kan worden ingeroepen tijdens de plaatsingsfase, niet nadat de uitvoering is begonnen.
Wanneer een inschrijver ook na een uitdrukkelijk verzoek om verduidelijking de gevraagde informatie niet verstrekt, is de aanbestedende overheid verhinderd de offerte te beoordelen en moet zij die nietig verklaren
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing van de onregelmatigverklaring van een offerte voor duurzame energieopslag, omdat de inschrijver — ook na een uitdrukkelijk verduidelijkingsverzoek — de vereiste informatie over standby- en koelingsverbruik niet verstrekte, waardoor de aanbestedende overheid de offerte niet kon aftoetsen aan het subgunningscriterium OPEX en verplicht was de offerte nietig te verklaren.
Wanneer het bestek een ISO-norm voorschrijft als meetmethode en alle metingen consequent boven de maximaal toegelaten grens uitkomen, is de onregelmatigverklaring van de offerte niet onwettig — ook al komen eigen metingen van de inschrijver tot een ander resultaat
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing van de onregelmatigverklaring van een offerte voor interventiebroeken, omdat het bestek uitdrukkelijk ISO 3801 als meetmethode voorschreef, alle laboratoriummetingen consequent een gewicht boven de maximaal toegelaten grens van 255 g/m² opleverden, en de inschrijver niet aannemelijk maakt dat het verschil tussen de eerste en tweede meting of haar eigen afwijkende metingen de wettigheid van de vaststelling aantasten.
Een kwalitatieve beoordeling waarbij dezelfde elementen uit een offerte bij meerdere gunningscriteria als min- of pluspunt worden meegenomen is niet onwettig, zolang de beoordeling telkens vanuit een ander kader en een andere invalshoek gebeurt
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tot schorsing van de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor visuele en verbale branding van de Stad Brugge, omdat de verzoeker niet aannemelijk maakt dat het ontbreken van een vooraf bekendgemaakte beoordelingsmethodiek onwettig is wanneer de evaluatie op een voor de hand liggende manier besloten lag in de omschrijving van de gunningscriteria, en omdat het meenemen van dezelfde offerteaspecten bij meerdere gunningscriteria geen verboden dubbele beoordeling uitmaakt wanneer de beoordeling telkens vanuit een andere invalshoek gebeurt.
Redeveloping a €16.5M square at zero public cost: if you don't include everything in the financial plan, you're out
The Council of State rejects a developer's challenge against the declaration of irregularity of its tender for a major public square redevelopment, finding that omitting certain facilities from the financial plan — while including them in descriptive notes — constitutes a substantive irregularity that prevents comparison with other tenders, and the contracting authority was not obliged to allow regularisation.
Bailiff services for forced debt recovery: not a public contract, but still a competitive process
The Council of State rejects a bailiff firm's challenge against the award of a contract for forced recovery of municipal debts, finding that such bailiff services — as exercise of public authority — are excluded from the Public Procurement Act under article 28 §1, 4°, e), meaning the expedited procedures of the Remedies Act are unavailable and the applicant failed to prove urgency.
Connection of Ghlin reservoirs to ORES network: suspension due to manifestly unreasonable decision not to postpone deadline after platform outage in last two hours
The Council of State suspends a contract award for connecting reservoirs to the ORES network, because the contracting authority committed a manifest error by not postponing the submission deadline after the e-Procurement platform's signature service was unavailable for over an hour during the last two hours before the deadline — the fact that one other tenderer could sign at the same time does not disprove the applicant's difficulties when the support service itself only confirmed 'a priori' that signatures should have been functional again.
Een gunningscriterium dat het verschil in RIZIV-terugbetaling tussen biosimilairen en een origineel geneesmiddel verrekent in de 'nettokost voor het ziekenhuis' kan de mededinging vervalsen en het gelijkheidsbeginsel schenden — ook al identificeert het de economisch voordeligste offerte voor het ziekenhuis
De Raad van State schorst de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor de levering van groeifactoren (G-CSF) aan ziekenhuizen, omdat het gunningscriterium 'nettokost voor het ziekenhuis' — dat de RIZIV-terugbetaling verrekent in de prijsscore — een structureel concurrentievoordeel van 209,88 euro toekent aan de enige producent van het originele geneesmiddel Lonquex (lipegfilgrastim), waardoor producenten van biosimilairen op basis van pegfilgrastim feitelijk niet kunnen mededingen, zelfs niet met een nulprijs.
Eight grounds over 104 pages in an extreme-urgency petition? The Council of State reads that as proof the case isn't serious
The Belgian Council of State rejects Etude Bordet's extreme-urgency suspension against an SWDE water-collections contract awarded to Venturis, noting explicitly that an extreme-urgency petition setting out eight grounds over more than a hundred pages is hardly compatible with the 'apparent illegality' such a suspension requires.
De regularisatiemogelijkheid voor fiscale schulden geldt ook bij dwingende spoed — en dwingende redenen van algemeen belang laten juist toe om voorbij te gaan aan de uitsluiting zelf, niet aan de regularisatieplicht
De Raad van State vernietigt de gunning van een opdracht voor elektriciteitslevering aan de stad Sint-Niklaas, omdat de aanbestedende overheid een inschrijver met fiscale schulden heeft uitgesloten zonder hem de wettelijk verplichte eenmalige regularisatiemogelijkheid van vijf werkdagen te bieden — terwijl dwingende spoed geen rechtvaardiging vormt om de regularisatieplicht over te slaan, en de wet integendeel voorziet dat dwingende redenen van algemeen belang toelaten om de verplichte uitsluiting zelf buiten toepassing te laten.
Wie een prijsformule in het bestek opneemt die niet werkt bij een nulprijs, kan die formule niet omzeilen door beide offertes het maximum te geven — en de onmogelijkheid om de formule toe te passen ontslaat de overheid niet van haar wettelijke verplichtingen
De Raad van State schorst de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor maaltijdcheques en geschenkcheques voor het personeel van Actiris, omdat de aanbestedende overheid de prijsformule uit het bestek niet kon toepassen wegens een nulprijs in een van de offertes en vervolgens aan beide offertes het maximum van 35 punten toekende — waardoor twee offertes met een verschillende prijs gelijk werden behandeld en het prijscriterium werd uitgehold, in strijd met het gelijkheidsbeginsel en het transparantiebeginsel.
Wie bij het prijsonderzoek steunt op eigen gegevens die niet van de inschrijver komen, moet die gegevens eerst aan de inschrijver voorleggen — en ze controleerbaar motiveren in het gunningsverslag
De Raad van State schorst de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor groenbeheerwerken langs kanalen en waterlopen, omdat de aanbestedende overheid de offerte van de verzoeker onregelmatig verklaarde op basis van eigen houtopbrengstcijfers uit een eerdere opdracht en een extern advies — zonder die gegevens eerst aan de inschrijver voor te leggen zodat hij erop kon reageren, en zonder in het gunningsverslag de bron of context van die cijfers te vermelden.
Inadequate motivation of sub-criteria is insufficient when the points gap is too large to affect the outcome
The Council of State rejects an IT training company's challenge against the award of a framework agreement for IT training services (game design, motion design, compositing VFX), holding that while some sub-criteria were inadequately motivated, the affected points were too few to bridge the gap with the threshold or the first-ranked tenderer, the criticism of trainer qualifications was unsubstantiated, and inviting only one tenderer for a price-only BAFO did not violate the equality principle since the applicant already had the lowest price.
Een louter beschrijvende beoordeling van offertes volstaat niet — de motivering moet voor elk beoordelingselement uit het bestek aangeven of en waarom een offerte beter of minder goed scoort
De Raad van State schorst voor de tweede maal de gunning van een architectuuropdracht voor 45 studentenwoningen in Doornik, omdat het nieuwe gunningsverslag — opgesteld na een eerste schorsingsarrest wegens motiveringsgebreken — opnieuw faalde in de formele motivering: de beoordeling van de offertes was louter beschrijvend zonder aan te geven of elementen positief of negatief werden gewaardeerd, gebruikte niet dezelfde beoordelingselementen voor elke offerte, en behandelde niet alle in het bestek aangekondigde beoordelingselementen voor het tweede criterium.
Wijzigingen aan meetstaten tijdens onderhandelingen in speciale sectoren schenden het gelijkheidsbeginsel niet als ze aan alle inschrijvers worden meegedeeld
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tegen de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor groenonderhoud, sneeuwruimen en zoutstrooien bij de NMBS, omdat de aanpassingen aan het bestek in de BAFO-fase ofwel verduidelijkingen waren van bestaande bestekbepalingen ofwel wijzigingen die aan alle inschrijvers gelijk werden meegedeeld, en omdat de verzoekende partij voor geen enkel van de vier betwiste percelen als tweede was gerangschikt — zodat zij haar belang bij de middelonderdelen over abnormale prijzen en vervlechting van winnende inschrijvers niet aantoonde.
Beoordelingsmethode NMBS-treincontract geschorst: verband tussen kwalitatieve labels en punten is onbegrijpelijk
De Raad van State schorst de aanwijzing van CAF als preferentiële inschrijver voor het AM30-raamakkoord van de NMBS (tot 4,66 miljard euro voor elektrische treinstellen), omdat de beoordelingsmethode voor het criterium 'technische waarde' niet toeliet te begrijpen hoe de generieke kwalitatieve labels en de vastgestelde meer- en minwaarden zich vertaalden in de toegekende puntenscores.
Kwaliteitsdoelstellingen per stuk beoordelen en scoren is geen ongeoorloofd gebruik van subgunningscriteria
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tegen de gunning van een raamovereenkomst voor warme drankautomaten omdat het systematisch beoordelen en scoren van elk van de in het bestek aangekondigde kwaliteitsdoelstellingen geen ongeoorloofde subgunningscriteria creëert, maar slechts de aangekondigde beoordelingsmethodiek van plus- en minpunten toepast.
Een minimumeis als 'te ontwikkelen' aanbieden is geen onregelmatigheid als het bestek die antwoordmogelijkheid voorziet
De Raad van State verwerpt de vordering tegen de gunning van een SaaS-opdracht omdat het bestek uitdrukkelijk toeliet dat inschrijvers minimumeisen als 'te ontwikkelen' aanboden — mits concrete beschrijving van de manier en het tijdsbestek — en omdat de aanbestedende overheid die aanpak ook bij de beoordeling op haar inhoudelijke merites mocht waarderen.
Een selectiecriterium zonder minimumdrempel is geen selectiecriterium — ook niet als de drempel 'nul' is
De Raad van State vernietigt de gunning van een takeldienst omdat geen enkel selectiecriterium in het bestek een minimaal vereist niveau bevatte — en een drempel van 'nul' niet geldt als een 'gepast eisenniveau' in de zin van artikel 65 van het plaatsingsbesluit.
Een gunningscriterium dat inschrijvers dwingt tot gissen, schendt het gelijkheidsbeginsel — ook buiten de wet overheidsopdrachten
De Raad van State vernietigt de gunning van een opdracht voor gerechtsdeurwaardersdiensten omdat het enige gunningscriterium — de signeringstermijn — onvoldoende informatie gaf over het aantal gelijktijdig te behandelen dwangbevelen, waardoor inschrijvers hun offerte op vermoedens moesten baseren.
Verbonden ondernemingen weren zonder ze te horen? Dat kan niet
De Raad van State schorst de wering van offertes van twee zusterondernemingen wegens vermeende mededingingsverstoring, omdat de aanbestedende overheid hen niet eerst de kans heeft gegeven om aan te tonen dat hun offertes onafhankelijk tot stand zijn gekomen.
Stel je beoordelingsmethode vast vóór de opening van de offertes — en pas ze correct toe
De Raad van State schorst een gunningsbeslissing voor meet- en detectietoestellen omdat de beoordelingsmethode voor het criterium 'functionele waarde' niet vooraf was vastgesteld en bovendien rekenkundig inconsistent was toegepast, waardoor de inschrijver de puntentoekenning niet kon controleren.
Rejection of price justification for 42.86% cheaper geophysical survey tender withstands marginal review
The Council of State rejects the emergency suspension request against the declaration of substantial irregularity of a tender for geophysical soil research, ruling that the contracting authority could reasonably find that the price justification — consisting of general efficiency factors and a mere cost breakdown per item — did not adequately rebut the apparent abnormality of a total price 42.86% below the average.
Suspension of cemetery park award due to disclosure of initial offer prices via e-Procurement before renegotiation — lowest bidder structurally disadvantaged by unequal playing field
The Council of State suspended the award of infrastructure works for a park cemetery in Beverlo (Beringen), finding that the visibility of the initial opening report with all total prices on the e-Procurement platform before the invitation to resubmit offers created an unlawful competitive advantage for other tenderers at the expense of the initially lowest bidder, in breach of the equality principle and Article 13 §1 of the Public Procurement Act.
Iveco challenges DAF's certification on the defence contract — while Iveco itself regularised three items of its own bid
The Council of State rejects Iveco's annulment action against the award of a defence contract for 879 trucks to DAF Trucks: a EURO III certificate based on UNECE Regulation No. 49 is equivalent to the EC type-approval abolished in 2006, and Iveco has no standing to challenge the regularisation of DAF's bid because it itself was allowed to adjust its own bid during negotiations on essential requirements.
Annulment of evening market domain concession award in Blankenberge — deviation from minimum bid amount after opening of tenders violates equality and patere legem principle
The Council of State annulled the award of a concession for the exploitation of seven evening markets in Blankenberge, finding that the city violated the principles of equality and patere legem by disregarding the minimum bid amount of €50,000 per year after all three tenderers had bid below that minimum.
If you want to attack the hardware supplier as competitor for the software running on it, do it in the initial petition — not in the supplementary brief
The Council of State rejects Vigo Universal's annulment action against the award to Timescope for developing a VR application that had to run on 'Timescope Mini' terminals supplied by Timescope: Vigo's strongest arguments — that the award criterion contained an unannounced visual sub-criterion, and that Timescope's competitive advantage from an earlier contract should have been neutralised — only surfaced in the supplementary brief and are therefore late.
If your e-procurement platform shows a different deadline from your email, you cannot brand bids as late
The Council of State suspends the award: Nautisport had announced by email that bids had to arrive by 2 July 2024, but the e-procurement platform itself — where bids had to be submitted — showed 18 July 2024; when Arcadus-Arcadis submitted on 18 July, their bid was rejected as late without any analysis of whose legitimate expectation had been created.
A price of €0 is always suspicious, €1 usually isn't — and that difference justifies different investigations
The Council of State rejects the extreme urgency suspension: the fact that Bruxelles-Propreté excluded bailiff M.L.'s bid (with four items at €0) via the strict price investigation of Article 36 and Exelia-Alterius's bid (with €1 and €15 per file) via the lighter verification of Article 35 is not unequal treatment — €0 is, per established case law, always an apparently abnormal price, whereas €1 is not necessarily.
Five lump-sum items per lot for towing services is sufficient: professional tenderer can calculate average price based on sector knowledge
The Council of State rejects the challenge against the award of a towing services contract because the contracting authority has broad discretion in drafting the inventory, the breakdown into five lump-sum items per lot is not unusual in the sector, and a professional service provider should be able to calculate a reasonable average price.
Second challenge against NMBS tilting poles rejected: distinction between negotiation and price justification, selective special price investigation permitted
The Council of State also rejects the application of another tenderer against the same NMBS award for tilting poles, clarifying that a price justification is not a negotiation, that the special price investigation may be applied selectively to the first-ranked tenderer, and that repeated inquiry is permitted.
Suspension of paper framework agreement: origin certificate does not cover all offered paper types
The Council of State suspends the award of a framework agreement for eco-friendly office paper because the contracting authority failed to adequately verify whether the submitted 'Origine France Garantie' certificate covered all specific paper types in the chosen tenderer's offer, while at least one paper type is produced in Brazil.
Sub-criteria that only surface at evaluation? That is allowed — but only under strict EU conditions, and the challenger must prove the breach concretely
The Council of State rejects cleaning company ACTIVA's appeal against the award of five lots of cleaning for military quarters to ISS and Cleaning Masters: the delegation of power to the colonel was legitimate, the use of sub-criteria not pre-weighted complied with EU case law, and ACTIVA showed no concrete assessment error.
Relying on sub-contractors? Deliver their tax and social security records too – or fail qualification
The Council of State rejects mask producer L.I. DECOR's appeal against exclusion by the French Community: a bidder relying on third-party capacity in a COVID mask procurement also had to prove those third parties had no social or tax debts.
A temporary association with 'two class-5 accreditations' doesn't automatically reach class 6: main category D and subcategory D1 don't add up
The Council of State suspends an ILVO award of €3.78M for the construction of poultry research barns because one of the two joint venture partners was only accredited in subcategory D1 — not in main category D — which breaks the 'add-up' rule of article 11 §2 of the Act of 20 March 1991.
If you ask everyone the same question, it's not unequal treatment — even if only one bidder has to adjust
The Council of State rejects Neovision's extreme urgency application against the award to Ecubel of refurbished laptops for Liège provincial schools because the Province could invoke article 76 §5 of the Royal Decree of 18 April 2017 to allow Ecubel to correct its offer — provided it asked all bidders the same clarification question simultaneously, which it did.
BAFO 'for better prices': the authority may skip feedback — your only bid is your only bid
The Council of State confirms that a contracting authority in a competitive procedure with negotiation may perfectly choose to give no feedback on initial offers and to request only a BAFO 'for better prices', even when one bidder scores much higher on quality and the other on price — 'negotiation' is not a second chance to rewrite your offer.
Works 'near a river' are not similar to riverside wall construction — not even if the stakeholders and water management are identical
The Council of State rejects the suspension: SPI was entitled to consider that sinking shafts beneath the Ourthe are not 'similar works' to the construction of a quayside wall along a watercourse, even though both sites involved the same type of river environment.
If you contest the irregularity finding instead of fixing it, you can't later claim unequal treatment
The Council of State rejects Sportinfrabouw's appeal: it had the same opportunity to regularise as Lesuco but chose to contest the finding of irregularity instead of adjusting its offer — and therefore cannot invoke discrimination.
The evaluation methodology may surface only in the award decision — and an offer with '…' in its lists will cost you points
The Council of State rejects the appeal: the Region was not required to disclose its evaluation methodology in advance, and the ambiguities in Production's offer (non-exhaustive format list, external DTP graphic designer of unclear cost status, paid hotline) justified the point deductions.
"Correcting" a price into a different unit than the specification prescribes is not a calculation error — it is rewriting the specification
The Council of State suspends the award to HR Groep Streetcare because the City of Antwerp recalculated the prices for the "truss frames for traffic signs" items into a price per square metre, while the specification and Standard Specification 250 expressly required a price per metre — a different unit than the one the competitor Trafiroad had used.
FWB may validly abandon SEPPT contract after finding both offers irregular
Claim rejected: the FWB could validly abandon the SEPPT contract after finding, in a third sufficiently motivated decision, that Cohezio's offer was, like CESI's, affected by a substantive irregularity and that the disputed award criterion needed revision.
Treating all bidders the same can itself be the problem: a restorer needs more inspection than a dismantler
The Council of State annuls the sale of a decommissioned Falcon 900 because Defence refused on-site technical inspection for everyone, while bidders who wanted to restore the aircraft to airworthiness needed that inspection far more than bidders who wanted to dismantle it for parts.
Listing technical differences and then giving everyone 24 out of 30: that is how you neutralise your own quality criterion
The Belgian Council of State annuls the award of an artificial-turf pitch contract because the contracting authority listed clear technical differences between the three bids in its award report, but then gave all three an identical 24/30 for 'quality' — and only a 0.5-point difference for 'guarantees' despite warranty differences of up to ten years.
A suspiciously high price is just as problematic as a suspiciously low one — price verification must go both ways
The Council of State suspends the award of the project & construction management for Vivalia's new regional hospital to ATIS because Vivalia only challenged low prices, while the winning bid was significantly above the estimate on several items without ever being questioned.
Council of State rejects annulment appeal against hockey field contract award in Ixelles – tender signature by authorised representative valid and fibre weight deviation not substantial
The Council of State rejected the annulment appeal by NV SportInfraBouw against the award of the contract for replacement of the synthetic surface and repair of the sprinkler system of the hockey field at Albert Demuyter stadium in Ixelles to NV Scheerlinck Sport, because the tender was validly signed by an authorised representative and the deviation in artificial turf fibre weight was not a substantial irregularity.
ICT management Sint-Truiden: annulment – assessment methodology with sub-criteria and own scoring scale not established in advance, and rule of three incorrectly applied distorting the ratio between award criteria
The Council of State annuls the award decision of the city of Sint-Truiden for ICT infrastructure management, user support and equipment supply, because the contracting authority used an assessment methodology with sub-criteria and a separate 10-point scoring per element that was not established in advance nor announced in the specifications, and because it applied the rule of three to rescale the highest-scoring tender to 100%, thereby distorting the ratio between the award criteria.
Emphyteusis padel courts Asphaltcosite Asse: annulment – policy objectives as assessment elements insufficiently clear in specifications, creating near-unlimited discretion
The Council of State annuls the Asse municipal council's decision to grant an emphyteusis for padel courts, because the award criterion 'socially responsible operation' (50 points) referred to 'policy objectives' on a website containing a 191-page multi-year plan with dozens of objectives, from which the authority selected assessment elements for the first time in the evaluation report — elements not identifiable as such on the website — granting the authority near-unlimited discretion and providing insufficient safeguards against arbitrary and discriminatory assessment.
Zandvliet waiting dock: rejection of annulment appeal – negative unit prices for soil disposal in Rotterdam insufficiently justified, contracting authority's assessment margin not exceeded
The Council of State rejects the annulment appeal by the temporary association HYE–Boskalis against the award by De Vlaamse Waterweg for the construction of a waiting dock at Zandvliet, because the negative unit prices for soil disposal in Rotterdam (-€4/m³ and -€5/m³ for items 2 and 3 of conditional part 1) were insufficiently justified — the adjustment of a reference price for Maas sand of €6.50/m³ down to €4 and €5/m³ due to 'lesser quality' lacked further specification or argumentation, and the contracting authority did not exceed its assessment margin.
Submitting new plans after your bid is not 'correcting a material error' — it's modifying your offer
The Council of State rejects the emergency appeal of a design team that, after submitting its design-build offer, sent revised plans and a €40,000 price reduction to 'correct' elevation errors: such structural adjustments are a modification of the offer, not a correction of a material error within the meaning of article 34.
Defence corrected an Excel error in the winning bid without saying which one — and that single silent asterisk costs the award
The Council of State annuls Defence's award of a framework agreement for maintenance at the Florennes military zone because the award decision states that the winner's T-figure was 'rectified' from 107.36 to 91.34, but nowhere explains which error was actually corrected — and post-hoc explanations by email cannot heal that defect.
An award criterion that only measures what you did last year does not measure what you are offering today
The Council of State suspends a mattress recycling award because the quality criterion 'recycling percentage' (60 of 100 points) leaned entirely on a Valumat certificate of 2022 performance — and therefore not on the offer itself, ignored later developments, and used a calculation method that disregards stocks.
Replacing a dietitian with a food safety auditor and quietly adding a second pupil: annulment plus EUR 3,461.50 in damages
The Council of State annuls the school meals contract awarded by Sint-Martens-Latem to Compass Group because the test panel that performed the organoleptic test had a different composition than announced in the specifications — no dietitian, two pupils instead of one — and grants Delimeal EUR 3,461.50 in damages (50 % of 10 % of its offer price of EUR 69,230 excl. VAT, one school year).
A 'senior' on your CV without dates: De Watergroep may award 'good' instead of 'very good'
The Council of State rejects D-Studio's appeal against the award of a BIM framework agreement to BIM Plan: for the 'project team experience' quality criterion (30 points), an authority may rate an offer 'good' (10/30) when concrete dates are missing from CVs — the 'senior' label on its own is not proof.
Cleaning of ONSS administrative premises: suspension – the contracting authority must examine corrective measures before excluding, the obligation under art. 70(2) to proactively report corrective measures only applies with express mention in the tender documents
The Council of State suspends the ONSS's decision to exclude a cleaning company from the procedure for cleaning administrative premises (three lots), because the ONSS failed to examine the proposed corrective measures and because the obligation to proactively report such measures at the start of the procedure (art. 70(2)) only applies when the tender documents expressly refer to it — the mere use of the ESPD is insufficient.
Framework agreement for cable and catenary works on Antwerp tram network: annulment for conflict of interest – designer Tractebel as sister company of tenderer Fabricom (both Engie subsidiaries) with three of six evaluation committee members
The Council of State annuls VVM De Lijn's award decision for a framework agreement for cable and catenary works on the Antwerp tram network, because De Lijn failed in its active duty to investigate conflicts of interest: the designer Tractebel, which had drafted the specifications and was represented by three of six evaluation committee members, is a sister company of Fabricom — a partner in the winning tenderer tm Antwerpen Boven — as both are (quasi 100%) subsidiaries of Engie with shared directors, which constitutes at minimum an appearance of partiality.
Household waste management in Etalle: suspension – the 'social considerations' criterion requiring a 'note demonstrating the social character of the company' is too vague and confers unlimited freedom of choice
The Council of State orders the suspension of the commune of Etalle's decision to award the 2024-2025 household waste management contract to DURECO, because the second award criterion 'Social considerations' (20 points), described only as 'a note of maximum one A4 page demonstrating the social character of the company', lacks the clarity and precision required by article 81 of the Law of 17 June 2016 and confers an unconditional freedom of choice on the contracting authority.
School construction at Jemeppe-sur-Sambre: second suspension – responding to a price justification request by invoking a material error does not constitute a unilateral modification of the tender
The Council of State orders, for the second time, the suspension of the French Community's decision to award the school construction contract at Jemeppe-sur-Sambre, because the contracting authority committed a manifest error of assessment by qualifying as a substantive irregularity (unilateral modification of the tender) the tenderer's response to a price justification request in which it invoked a material error.
Annulment of Verviers workplace prevention services award — successful tenderer submitted 5-page note instead of 2, without the irregularity being qualified or reasoned
The Council of State annuls the award of the 'External Prevention and Protection Service' contract of the City of Verviers to SPMT ARISTA because the contracting authority noted that the successful tenderer's offer contained a 5-page A4 methodology note instead of the 2-page maximum prescribed by the specifications, but neither qualified this irregularity as substantive or non-substantive nor reasoned its decision to treat the offer as regular.
A 'shelf life in months' isn't arithmetic — production and delivery may share the same calendar month
The Council of State refuses to suspend the award of 5 million surgical face masks to YNK Group, because the winning bidder credibly explained that its 60-month shelf life from delivery holds when production and delivery fall within the same month — even though Protect and Care chose to deduct production and transport time from its own offer.
Use the workaround without protest, lose the right to attack it later
The Council of State refuses to suspend an award where both BAFOs were submitted by email after the e-tendering platform failed, because the complainant itself used that very same workaround without any objection and therefore has no standing to invoke the irregularity against the winner.
Bike lease suspended: three assessment errors on quality criterion bridge the points gap
The Council of State suspends the award of a framework agreement for operational bike leasing because the contracting authority made three errors in assessing the quality criterion — an unreasonable minus for mandatory maintenance, an unmotivated plus for social employment, and a non-comparative plus for a discount voucher — which together bridge the 2.5-point gap.
Loss of a chance quantified lot by lot: EUR 147,264 for three bailiff firms excluded from an information meeting
The Council of State awards reparatory damages of EUR 147,264.38 to three bailiff firms excluded from a service contract for tax recovery by the Walloon Region, quantifying their loss of chance lot by lot — from 50% to 75% depending on the number of tenderers per lot — and applying a 10% profit margin on unrealised turnover.
Two different references, two identical scores: that needs an explanation
The Council of State suspends the award because Idelux gave the same 5/5 score to a 134-seat reference and a 156-seat reference without any explanation — and because a different score on that single sub-sub-criterion was just enough to flip the ranking.
When the contracting authority 'loses' your offer, your stamped envelope saves you
The Berchem-Sainte-Agathe public welfare centre awarded a medication contract to Pharma Force on the ground that 'two offers were received' — but Multipharma had filed its offer on time, as proven by a stamped envelope with date and time, and the Council of State annuls the award.
If you first declare a bid irregular and then accept it anyway, you must say more — not less
The Council of State suspends the award of six artificial football pitches to Sportinfrabouw because the municipality of Beveren, after having declared two bids substantially irregular, changed its mind without properly justifying that reversal.
A contracting authority can cancel and restart a procedure — even if that costs you a near-guaranteed award
The Council of State dismisses Theis Marcel's challenge against SOFICO: under Article 85 of the Belgian procurement law, a contracting authority has broad discretion to cancel and restart a procedure, even after two previous awards have been suspended and a competitor is next in line.
Parallel judgment on lot 2 Spy: the contracting authority's broad power to cancel and restart applies equally here
In the same SOFICO saga as judgment 258.032, but for lot 2 (Spy district), the Council of State confirms that Theis Marcel cannot claim the award: Article 85 of the procurement law allows the authority to abandon and restart the procedure with a corrected specification.
Winning a suspension isn't enough: if you don't bid in the replacement tender, you lose your standing — and you pay the costs
Five years after the Council of State suspended the award of the 'Silver Tower' lease to Ghelamco, the Council declares Fedimmo's annulment action inadmissible because Fedimmo (WTC IV) did not participate in the new procurement procedure launched by the Brussels Region in 2019, nor did it challenge the new specifications or the new award.
If your own cover letter states you cannot meet the specifications, a mere promise to 'comply' won't fix the irregularity
The Council of State dismisses Veolia's emergency suspension request against Ghent University, the incumbent contractor's bid for the HVAC maintenance framework being declared substantially irregular because Veolia's cover letter expressly stated that some specifications were 'not feasible' and proposed an alternative working method — defects going to the very essence of the bid that could not be cured by a mere statement of intent to comply.
Compensating an expired VCA certificate with an ISO certificate you'll only receive two months later? RESA lost the award
The Council of State suspends the Liège grid operator RESA's selection and award of a tree-pruning contract to Bois & Travaux because, on the application deadline (4 August 2021), Bois & Travaux had neither a valid VCA certificate — it had expired seven days earlier — nor the 'equivalent' ISO 45001:2018 certificate, which it would only obtain on 4 October 2021.
Even when your contract falls outside the procurement law: awarding 64 out of 100 points on publicly available financial ratios is discriminatory
The Council of State rejects RESA's appeal against the Walloon Minister's annulment of its award of a judicial debt-collection contract to bailiff firm Tintin: even for 'excluded' legal services (article 28 §1 4° of the 2016 Procurement Act), the equality principle applies, and using 64 of 100 points on publicly available balance-sheet ratios while you yourself select which firms to consult means you can predict the winner before any bid arrives.
A social award criterion without a link to the subject matter and without a control mechanism: doubly unlawful
The Council of State annuls a road-marking contract awarded by the city of Enghien because the social-employment award criterion was not linked to the subject matter of the contract and was insufficiently precise to allow control — the winner offered 700 hours of social employment on a contract whose total work volume was estimated at barely 480 person-hours.
Want to challenge a technical evaluation? First calculate whether your grievances can bridge the score gap — otherwise you lose your standing
The Council of State rejects Frontforce's appeal against the award of a dispatching software contract to BV Verdi: one branch was declared inadmissible because a hypothetical recalculation showed that the 7.11-point score gap could not be bridged even if all grievances were upheld.
You can't 'edit out' a late offer component — if one piece arrives late, the entire offer is tainted
Intradel tried to rescue a previously-annulled award to Strabag by simply excluding the late-submitted performance note from the scoring, but the Council of State confirms that a late component poisons the whole offer — you can't reason away the contamination by ignoring the contaminated piece.
Rewarding a bid for being 'better than the specifications require' is discrimination
The Council of State annuls a €4.2 million award for the construction of the Parc des Colombophiles in Anderlecht because Brussels Environment awarded the winning bid higher scores precisely because it deviated from a technical requirement in the specifications.
When two bidders in a three-player market suddenly claim twice as many partners, you have to verify — not explain it away
The Council of State suspends an electronic meal-voucher award to Edenred because the French Community uncritically accepted Edenred's dramatically higher partner numbers (39,103 vs 20,592 in Flanders) when Edenred's own offer signaled those figures included MasterCard merchants without genuine affiliation contracts.
Two sister companies, one signature and a score of 5/10 on a 0-2-4-6-8-10 scale: double suspension
The Council of State suspends the award of a 6.7 million euro framework contract for police trousers to Sioen Nederland because the federal police inadequately reasoned the link between Sioen NV and Sioen Nederland BV, and because one competitor (Seyntex) received intermediate scores on an evaluation scale that only allowed even-numbered points.
Same ADN certificate: 'extra experience' for the winner, ignored for the loser — that doesn't hold
The Belgian Council of State suspended an award by Flemish Waterways because in the quality criterion motivation, the same elements (an ADN certificate, government experience, examination committee work) counted positively for one bidder and were ignored for another, without anywhere explaining the difference.
When the contracting authority offers a chance to regularise and you refuse — that equals 'I do not accept the contract terms'
The Council of State dismisses Verhoeve Marc's challenge to the rejection of his lowest bid for the redesign of the Waaitjesstraat in Lebbeke: he read item 5 of the bill of quantities (600 m² of cobblestone surfacing) as covering only the repair of the ~50 m² still in place, refused the formal offer to regularise, and stuck stubbornly to his own reading — a stance the Council equates with non-acceptance of the contract terms.
What the tender documents functionally require is a minimum requirement — even if the word 'mandatory' or 'module' never appears
The Council of State refuses suspension: a tool that the specifications require to perform 'native' analyses against ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 is a minimum requirement under article 76 of the placement royal decree — failing to demonstrate that functionality renders the offer substantially irregular, even if the documents never used the word 'modules'.
In a negotiated procedure you may refuse regularisation — but the file must show you considered it
The Council of State suspends the award of lot 2 of La Louvière's parks-guarding contract because the contracting authority, when finding Seris Security's offer substantially irregular for an 'abnormally low' price, failed to demonstrably weigh whether to allow regularisation under article 76, § 5, of the placement royal decree — a discretionary power that must actually be exercised.
€1 million cheaper and still excluded: forgotten road signalling in item B.01.01 makes the bid irregular
The Council of State confirms that Wallonia rightly excluded the lowest bidder (€4.52M) because one major item of its price justification did not include the legally required road signalling — and may simultaneously accept the winner (€5.80M) on the basis of a short but concrete reasoning.
Discount for multi-lot award? Then you must rank three times — not once
The Council of State suspends Idelux's award of nine waste-collection lots to Remondis because the intercommunal compared all offers against a single reference point (Remondis with discount) instead of ranking each scenario separately — a calculation error that shifted the outcome in Remondis's favour.
70 points for service, 30 for price in a book tender: acceptable when the market justifies it
The Council of State dismisses Standaard Boekhandel's challenge against the award to Distri-Bib for the Antwerp public library's book framework, accepting that service may weigh 70 out of 100 points because 85% of deliveries fall under the regulated book price.
The cheapest and best-quality bid still loses. The culprit: how the price criterion was split
The Council of State dismisses Canon's challenge against the award of the Farys printer fleet framework to Ricoh, despite Canon submitting both the lowest overall price and the highest-quality offer — because Farys split the price criterion into three sub-criteria (devices 50%, management software 10%, additional services 5%) based on a documented market study and needs survey, and the weights stand 'in reasonable relation' to the likely importance of each component.
Bruxelles Environnement invented a 'competitive advantage' the law does not recognise — the Council suspends the re-tendering of the climbing-rock case
The Council of State suspends Bruxelles Environnement's decision to abandon the award and re-tender the 'Aménagements paysagers' contract for Anderlecht's Colombophiles park, because the contracting authority committed three legal errors: a deviation from the specifications was wrongly called a 'variant', an irregularity was declared substantial under a non-existent category 'competitive advantage', and a material specification (resin concrete) was wrongly treated as a brand reference under art. 53.
Saying a lawyer has 'no State aid experience' while crediting his teaching of competition law that includes State aid is a contradictory motivation — and it gets annulled
The Council of State annuls the award of lot 18 (State aid) of the Walloon framework agreement for legal services because the evaluation panel wrote that Lexing's lawyer 'lacked practical experience in State aid' while in the same motivation acknowledging that he taught a university course on economic aspects of competition law and was a member of a research centre studying State aid.
A volume threshold of 70,000 cases a year is fine — but 'for one and the same client' is a separate decision that needs its own justification
The Council of State suspends the non-selection of bailiff Bordet for the joint debt-collection contract of SWDE and CILE because the selection criterion requiring 70,000 cases per year handled 'for one and the same client' lacks an independent justification and unduly restricts competition — while the previous tender allowed cumulation across multiple clients.
Three weeks faster than the winner — and yet the same 20/30: a bonus clause for early delivery you don't apply costs you the award
The Council of State annuls the City of Halle's award of the floor renewal of CC 't Vondel to Phenix Group: the specifications stated that an early delivery would have a 'favourable influence' on the execution-time criterion, but the City gave both Phenix Group and Stals en Zoon Parketvloeren — whose delivery was three weeks shorter — an identical score of 20 out of 30 with the sole motivation 'falls perfectly within [the] requested period'.
A contracting authority can require its bidders to work with a supplier who never submitted a bid — provided that supplier falls under a statutory exclusion ground
The Belgian Council of State rejects the action of three competing bailiffs against a TMVW tender that imposes cooperation with 'central bailiff Philip Scheir bvba' (appointed without competition) for the legal leg of external debt management — statutory bailiff tasks fall outside procurement law via art. 28 §1 4° e) of the 2016 Act, and without a cross-border element European transparency obligations also do not apply.
€262 million or €120 million in 'real-estate development turnover'? Adding holding income to clear the threshold — and losing under extreme urgency
The CIT BLATON – GHELAMCO consortium was not selected for the redevelopment of the former town hall of Etterbeek (a competitive dialogue requiring €120 million in 'real-estate development turnover' over three years), and the Council refuses suspension under extreme urgency because Ghelamco's attempt to add holding income (classes 74 and 76A of the annual accounts) to its actual sales turnover (class 70) does not match the accounting definition of turnover and because 'managing shares is not in itself a real-estate development activity'.
Strict for the excluded bidder, lenient for the winner — a contracting authority cannot apply the same rule both ways at once
The Belgian Council of State suspends the award of Walloon red-light speed cameras because the Walloon Region rejected Jacops's offer over a technical detail, while simultaneously scoring the winner just above the exclusion threshold for a software demonstration 'essentially given via PowerPoint' — when the tender required a live demo on penalty of exclusion.
Rejecting bidder A for a specific shortcoming while admitting bidder B with exactly the same shortcoming is not allowed
The Council of State annuls the award of a Liège public works contract because the city declared Genetec's offer irregular for missing a detailed cost calculation of safety measures, while the winning Yvan Paque offer on that very point contained only two lump sums — without any detail.
Unilaterally redrawing the price structure of an offer and calling it 'arithmetic-error correction' doesn't work — article 34 only covers errors whose result is contrary to the bidder's intention
The Council of State suspends the award of Charleroi's contract for rental and maintenance of work clothing because the city unilaterally 'corrected' CWS Workwear's prices under article 34 of the Procurement Royal Decree — while the alleged 'error' did not produce a result contrary to the bidder's intention, and the city did not seek the bidder's real intention but applied its own conception of what was acceptable.
An award report that also voices criticism of the winner is no reason to overturn the award — what counts is what the report puts beside it
The Council of State rejects an extreme-urgency action against the award of an architecture contract for a Schaarbeek crèche: the fact that the award report also expresses reservations about the winner does not mean the score of 4 out of 5 is unjustified, when alongside it five concrete advantages are listed that the applicants' bid does not offer.
Complaining that the specifications are unlawful while simultaneously demanding the contract be awarded to you — that does not work
The Council of State rejects a third extreme-urgency action against Ghent University Hospital: after the contracting authority withdrew earlier awards to a competitor and ultimately cancelled the entire procedure to fix a flaw in the specifications about INAMI/RIZIV reimbursement, the bidders who had themselves pointed out that flaw cannot now claim a 'direct' award.
If the tender documents make award conditional on a homologation 'before award', its absence is automatically a substantial irregularity
The Council of State rejects the suspension of a contract for 60,000 LED luminaires for the Liège grid operator RESA: by stating in the specifications that the luminaire model must have obtained the Synergrid '005' homologation 'before award of the contract', the specifications themselves qualified this as a minimum and substantial requirement — so Lightwell and Axioma's offers could be excluded as substantially irregular even though they had been invited to a BAFO and offered competitive prices.
A price 25% below the average survives — and the winner can still ask for an extra €100,000 once the bid commitment period expires
The Council of State rejects an extreme-urgency action against the award of the Bruges artificial-turf contract to Lesuco: a total price 25% below the average can be justified by 'market leadership, turnover and expertise', and when the bid commitment period expires, the winner may request price increases due to market conditions without the other bidders getting a chance to revise their bids.
A natural-stone boulder where the spec required 'resin concrete': Brussels-Environment punished the compliant bidder, rewarded the deviant — and lost the contract
The Council of State suspends the award of a €4.2 million park redevelopment in Anderlecht because the contracting authority gave the winning bidder bonus points for a natural-stone climbing rock when the specifications explicitly required 'resin concrete' — and so pushed the rule-compliant competitor into second place by 1.68 points.
When lots are involved, the contracting authority may require references to fit the lot — even if the specifications do not say so explicitly
The Council of State refuses to suspend Spa-Francorchamps' decision not to select TPRecup for lots 1 (track maintenance) and 2 (cleaning of internal roads), holding that it is reasonable to require references relevant to the specific lot — even where the specifications do not differentiate between lots.
Whoever lost the 12-year IRISnet3 contract gets no second chance in extreme urgency — five grounds, all 'not serious'
The Council of State rejects Proximus' extreme-urgency suspension claim against the award of the IRISnet3 contract to Orange Belgium: all five pleas — alleged irregularity of the winner's free tools, abnormal pricing, regularisation issues and evaluation of qualitative criteria — are deemed 'not serious'.
A specification that puts 'non-recoverable judicial costs' on the contractor effectively excludes judicial officers
The Council of State annuls a debt-collection contract because the specifications placed the burden of judicial costs that could not be recovered from the debtor on the contractor — a condition that judicial officers, bound by the 1976 royal decree on their tariff, cannot legally bear.
A physical test piece as award criterion for restoration works? Permitted — even if the assessment of craftsmanship feels subjective
The Council of State rejects the extreme-urgency suspension against the award of the 'Maçonneries' lot of the restoration of the Sainte-Croix Collegiate in Liège to the temporary association Galère / Liégeois because a 'pièce d'épreuve' — a physical test piece in carved tuffeau stone — and the accompanying methodological note, together worth 20 points out of 100, are a valid award criterion and no manifest assessment error by the jury was demonstrated.
Did a tender clause look unclear? Ask for clarification during the procedure — afterwards is too late
The Council of State rejects the extreme-urgency suspension against the award of the digitisation of Verviers' civil registry to Vanden Broele because ADM Village only complained about 'incomprehensible' tender clauses after losing — while during the procedure it never asked for clarification and in its reply to the contracting authority's question even showed it understood the requirements, only that it found its own interpretation to offer more 'added value'.
Concession or public contract? The difference comes down to one question: who loses money if the market collapses?
The Council of State rejects Clear Channel's extreme-urgency suspension against the award to JCDecaux of the Antwerp concession for 150 city advertising signs (8 years, 85% price / 15% sustainability) because the operational risk lies entirely with the concessionaire — who must invest in the infrastructure, pay an annual retributie even for signs without advertisers, and bear what the Court of Justice calls 'the whims of the market'.
If you don't check your e-Notification dashboard, the contracting authority can reject your bid — 'I didn't get the email' is no defence
The Council of State dismisses the extreme-urgency challenge by Tectum Constructors against the award to SCTD for the roofs of the Mons Music Academy: when the procurement is run via e-Notification, a bidder who does not consult its restricted file on that official platform cannot later claim it missed a price-justification request — the authority is not required to prove that the bidder actually received or opened the invitation.
A 'required option' rules your bid out, an 'allowed option' does not — and what the tender does not impose as a minimum, bidders are free to limit
The Council of State dismisses Siemens Mobility's extreme-urgency challenge to the award of the Hermelijn tram midlife revision to CAF (76.75 vs 70.94 out of 100): CAF was free to limit its corrosion treatment to 20 m² of light rust per tram and 3 cracks because the tender set no minimum surface area, free to overlap its study and prototype phases because the tender only required a 40-day gap between document submission and prototype start, and free to offer an incomplete anti-collision system because that was an 'allowed' (not 'required') option — and Article 56 § 2 of the Royal Decree on special sectors 2017 only sanctions the option itself in that case, not the base bid.
A scoring formula that amplifies point differences is allowed — provided the tender documents disclose it upfront
The Council of State rejects an appeal against the award of a €125 million Flemish postal services framework agreement and rules that tender documents may rescale scores on a qualitative criterion so the best bid automatically receives 100% — even if this significantly amplifies the point differences.
A social award criterion for painting white lines on the road: too far from the object, too vague to score
The Council of State suspends the award by the city of Enghien of a framework agreement for road marking because it included socioprofessional integration of vulnerable groups as an award criterion that lacked a real link to the object of the contract and was insufficiently precise to compare offers.
A '<' sign before your deadline turns your times into a range — and costs you a major SEPP contract
Cohezio, an established occupational health and prevention service provider, loses its SEPPT contract with the Province of Liège because it used formulae like '< 24h' instead of fixed intervention times — which the province read as a prohibited time range, and which the Council of State found not manifestly unreasonable enough to suspend.
'Prices were adjusted where necessary': three words in a tender evaluation report enough to suspend De Lijn's printing framework
The Council of State suspends LijnCom's award of the framework contract for printing and adhesive advertising on De Lijn buses to 3Motion, because after the price justification round the contracting authority 'adjusted' some of the winner's unit prices — whereas article 36, § 3 of the 2017 placement royal decree offers only three options: reject the tender, reject the tender, or give reasons why the total amount is not abnormal.
The width requirement was 'crucial' for Hilton and a 'target' for Vanderr — with no paper trail, De Lijn has to start over
The Council of State suspends the award of an overhead line maintenance vehicle for the Ghent tram network to Vanderr, because De Lijn first labelled the width requirement (2300 mm) as 'crucial' to Hilton Engineering and then treated it as a 'target' for Vanderr, without any written trace of that change of treatment in the administrative file.
'Yes / no / in order': checkboxes in a table are no motivation for technical regularity — certainly not when the Synergrid homologation is wobbly
The Council of State suspends RESA's 10 million-euro award for 60,000 LED luminaires to Axioma-Lightwell and Schreder because the evaluation report substantiates the technical regularity of the winning tenders merely with three checkboxes reading 'non', 'non' and 'en ordre' — whereas at the hearing it emerged that the driver in the winning offer is not the one with which the luminaire obtained its Synergrid 005 homologation.
Extracting a 500 mm centre-to-centre distance from a BIM model while the specifications show a figure with 122 mm: that bet Franki lost
The Council of State rejects Franki Construct's extreme-urgency action against the award of the cycle bridge at the N75 in Dilsen-Stokkem to Stadsbader: deriving a centre-to-centre spacing of 500 mm from an enlarged detail of the layout plan, while the specific specifications twice show a figure with 122 mm and safety requirements rule out a large opening, does not create a contradiction between the plan and the specifications that could be resolved via the precedence rule.
G4S loses by 1.38 points and receives three 'negatives' — the Council finds two of them indistinguishable from weaknesses in the winning bid
The Council of State suspends the award of security services for the South Tower to Seris Security because the reasons given for three negative marks against incumbent G4S do not explain why it scored 3.5 points less than the winning bidder on the quality criterion — when the same weaknesses appear in the winning bid too.
A bank statement that the bidder 'has sufficient means' is not a selection criterion — without a threshold, the entire award falls
The Council of State suspends the award to SA Billy of the 'Smart mobility BW' bike-sharing service because the financial-capacity selection criterion is limited to a bank statement without a fixed threshold and there is no second financial criterion — a double breach of article 65 of the Royal Decree on Procurement.
A 'NOK' that becomes 'OK' after follow-up questions is not automatically an unlawful regularisation — if it concerns selection, not the offer itself
The Council of State dismisses Coeman Repatriëring's suspension against the award to Depannage Lybaert of the South-East towing lot, because the additional information the contracting authority requested on staff, premises and intervention vehicles did not fall under the strict regularisation rules for offers, but under the more lenient rules for requesting evidence of technical capacity.
'We are the largest sand trader in the Netherlands' is not a price justification
The Council of State rejects Hye-Boskalis' extreme-urgency challenge against the award of the Zandvliet waiting dock to Herbosch-Kiere–Hens: negative unit prices of -€4 and -€5 per m³ for the disposal of dredged sand cannot be substantiated with Boskalis' market position and a single comparison contract from another project — when you deviate sharply from the estimate AND from the competitors, your justification must be cost-component-by-cost-component, not story-by-company.
The contracting authority that would have 'rescued' Flowbird with a question would have breached the equal treatment principle itself
The Council of State rejects Flowbird's extreme-urgency challenge against Parking Brussels' award to Be-Mobile of the Business Rules Engine contract: a 'technical note' of five pages required on pain of nullity cannot be replaced by a 114-page Technical Memorandum or a 14-page Helicopter Vision — and the contracting authority would have been wrong to ask Flowbird about it.
Before filing an extreme-urgency action, do the maths: AGA challenged 3.06 points across six questions while the total gap was 3.24
The Council of State rejects AGA's extreme-urgency action against the award to Modero of an eight-year framework for bailiff services to the city of Antwerp, because its complaints about the page limit, the demo duration and the motivation are either factually wrong or — for the motivation challenge — leave AGA without sufficient interest: the contested points cannot bridge the total score gap.
A concession with no written criteria can still be annulled four years later — even when the defendant doesn't bother to fight back
The Council of State annuls, via the abbreviated procedure, two decisions of the City of Dinant distributing quays and boat moorings on the Meuse between tourist boat operators, because no selection criterion or reason was ever formulated — and the City didn't even ask the procedure to continue.
The tender requires integration with one supplier's hardware — and that supplier bids and wins. That alone is not bias
The Council of State refuses to suspend an award to French company Timescope for a VR application about Le Grognon in Namur, even though the tender expressly required integration with Timescope hardware — because that specification appears objectively justified by the subject matter of the contract and the applicant cannot demonstrate a concrete advantage.
The winner built the very quality framework the tender relies on — and that alone is not a reason to exclude them
The Council of State refuses, in extreme urgency, to suspend an award where the winning bidder (IPSO) had previously drawn up the quality reference framework and supporting database that the new tender re-used — because the applicant could not concretely demonstrate a competitive advantage.
Awarding 'excellent' because a bid is better in 'at least 3 domains' — without ever saying which 3 — costs the award
The Council of State suspends Defence's award of the multi-year green-maintenance contract for the Florennes military zone to Krinkels because the formal motivation lists qualitative strengths per bidder but does not allow verification that the score 'excellent' (reserved for offers better than the others in at least 3 domains) was actually attributed in line with the announced evaluation method.
Lowest tariff, best price — and lost anyway: how four small minus points cost a 10-year bicycle-sharing concession
The Council of State dismisses Marfina's extreme-urgency suspension against the award of the Antwerp bike-sharing concession to Donkey Republic — Marfina won on price and on tariff, but lost 14 points on quality because of an accumulation of details (a coaster brake that did not exist, a maintenance app not available in Dutch, a vague description of a social-employment partner) that each looked minor in isolation.
May the contracting authority allow a flawed subcontractor to be replaced — or must it? The Belgian Council of State refers the question to the CJEU
The Council of State reopens the debate in the annulment action against the award of a Ghent restoration contract and refers two preliminary questions to the Court of Justice on whether a contracting authority is obliged, or merely allowed, to require a tenderer to replace a subcontractor that does not meet the selection criteria.
You won the first suspension — and you think the contracting authority is now obliged to award to you? The opposite can happen: in round two you fall out on irregularities
The Council of State rejects Fire Technics's second urgent suspension request against the Hainaut-Centre rescue zone: after a successful first suspension in February 2020, the contracting authority may withdraw its decision and issue a new award decision in which Fire Technics's bid is excluded for substantial irregularities — even if that bid was found regular in the first round.
A 'selection' by a selection committee is not automatically a challengeable decision — wait for validation by the competent body
The Council of State declares the application of Step Group and Mimob against the selection of a competing project on the Prés de Tilff site inadmissible: a 'décision de sélection' of a parity selection committee is here only a preparatory act, and the final decision of the competent bodies did not yet exist when the petition was filed.
A 'loose list of grievances' is not a ground — an urgent suspension petition cannot be repaired later through a reply note
The Council of State rejects Frontforce's urgent suspension request against the award of dispatching software by the Flemish Brabant West rescue zone to Verdi: a petition that merely lists points without explaining why a recalculation would change the ranking does not meet the structure and specificity requirements — and what is missing in the petition cannot be added via a reply note.
96 parking spaces against a requirement of 100 is not a substantial irregularity — and a 6.5% architect fee is not abnormal, even when 27% below the runner-up
The Council of State rejects D E Architecten's urgent suspension request against the award to M4 Architecten of a study contract for a local service centre and child-care facility in Sint-Pieters-Leeuw: a bid with 4 parking spaces fewer than required and a fee of 6.5% (against 8.25% for the second-best) is not substantially irregular in this context — and the price examination needs no explicit motivation as long as the contracting authority finds no appearance of abnormality.
An €800,000 framework agreement can be awarded to a class 2 contractor — as long as each call-off stays below the threshold
The Council of State rejects TECNOFLEX's urgent suspension request against the award to HOME PERSPECTIVE of a framework agreement for window replacement at the Port of Brussels (€324,387 ex. VAT, total €800,000 over 4 years): for a framework agreement, the certification class is assessed per call-off, not on the overall budget — even when the contracting authority decides to free up €400,000 for the first year.
A 'reservation' about air freight and customs in your masks bid wasn't a useful clarification — it was a deviation from the delivery schedule that cost you the award
The Council of State rejects I'll Be Bag's challenge against the Covid mask procurement of 50 million Community masks (awarded to Avrox and Tweeds & Cottons): tendering with 'reservations' about transport and customs on a strict delivery schedule is legally a deviation — and challenging that deviation only later, in a supplementary note, comes too late and forfeits the right to attack the remaining grounds.
One abnormal unit price knocks your whole bid out of the race — even if your total amount looks competitive
The Council of State rejects De Vriese's urgent suspension request against the award of bicycle-path maintenance in Ostend to Adiel Maes (€635,072.36): bidders who limit their price justification to a breakdown of activities, or to a reference to their subcontractor's offer, risk having their bid declared irregular on a single item — losing the entire contract.
A commitment letter from your parent company is NOT a formality — leave it out of your application and you lose the contract, even after four years of proceedings
The Council of State rejects Chantiers Allais's urgent suspension request against its non-selection for the river patrol boats: any candidate relying on the financial capacity of its parent company must include a formal commitment letter from that parent in its application — group affiliation does not suffice, and post-deadline supplements are worthless, even when the contracting authority initially missed the flaw.
An award criterion pointing to a specifications article that doesn't exist, plus headline scores with no breakdown — Villers-la-Ville loses its cleaning tender on a misapplied 30-point criterion
The Council of State suspends the cleaning contract awarded by Villers-la-Ville because the third award criterion ('management and emergency interventions', 30 points) refers to an article 3.1 of the specifications that simply doesn't exist — and the authority gives identical 25/30 scores to bids with manifestly different quality.
Sorting in Lokeren counts as 'processing', pre-treatment in Hamme doesn't — Verko's own contradiction suspends the award
Verko unilaterally moved Van Werven's 'processing site' from Hamme (8.6 km) to Lanaken (149 km), wiping out 20 environmental points — but accepted Renewi's sorting as 'processing'; that asymmetric reading sinks the award.
‘Material aid’ as an award criterion for textile collection: what happens to the collected textile after pickup still counts as ‘link with the subject of the contract’
The Council of State dismisses Recutex-Victrans’s challenge against the award to Televil because a social award criterion that measures how much collected textile a bidder makes available for poverty relief does have a sufficient link with the public contract — it forms part of the final stage of the processing chain, and in a reserved contract for social-economy operators it measures the quality of the service itself.
What the contracting authority calls a 'wish' and what is a binding requirement — in 'Espace Rogier' that distinction costs the City of Namur a full suspension
The Council of State suspends the award of a 14 million euro combined contract to Cœur de Ville because the general programme — repeatedly and unambiguously — imposed an R+3 height for the private housing blocks, while the winning bid proposed R+5: a binding specification, not a 'wish', and the overshoot affects the price award criterion.
A selected candidate who fails to submit a first offer is in principle out of the race — unless the contracting authority fully reopens phase two with a fundamentally amended specification
The Council of State rejects the suspension of the award of the Zorg Leuven central kitchen contract to Compass Group, because the contracting authority did not 'continue' phase two of the negotiated procedure but fully halted and reopened it with a fundamentally amended specification — allowing the other selected candidate (who had not submitted a first offer) to participate again.
Calculating the fee percentage on a fixed reference estimate rather than on the actual proposed project budget is no manifest error — it is a legitimate choice of the contracting authority
The Council of State rejects the suspension of the award of the Tournaisis police-station architecture contract to BAEB-BAG-VK Engineering, because a contracting authority that calculates the fee percentage on a common reference estimate (€10m) rather than on each bidder's individual project estimate stays within its discretionary freedom — even if the winner can thereby work with a much higher project budget (€14.3m) than the other bidders.
Two questionable subcontractors in your file? The contracting authority does not owe you a second chance
The Council of State dismisses Monument Vandekerckhove's appeal against the award of the Ghent gas-holder restoration: article 73, §1, second paragraph of the Royal Decree on Award gives a bidder no unconditional right to replace a non-compliant subcontractor — the contracting authority retains discretion, and the equality principle may oppose replacement.
You can't 'tailor' the gap-filling formula to save your preferred bidder
The Council of State suspends the award of the Boom artificial turf contract because AGB Plus replaced the gap-filling formula of article 86, §2 of the Royal Decree on Award with its own variant — and didn't even establish that all bidders understood item 71 the same way.
Damages after annulment: the principle is accepted, the amount isn't — debates reopened
The Council of State dismisses six admissibility objections against the damages claim of three 'reserve' bailiffs after the annulment of the award decisions for lots 1-4 of the Walloon bailiff framework — but cannot quantify the loss on the Walloon Region's untested figures and reopens the debates.
One office outside the service area: that's not a hidden sub-criterion, it's just less accessibility
The Council of State dismisses the application of a lawyer partnership that lost the Pidpa debt-collection contract — taking into account the spread of offices within the service area is not a hidden sub-criterion but a legitimate reading of 'accessibility for customers'.
Evaluating an excavator while 'abstracting away the boom': that does not work
The Council of State annuls the award of an excavator contract to Luyckx because, at the specification-mandated demonstration, Luyckx brought a Hitachi with a two-piece boom while its bid (and the specification) called for a monoboom — the City of Genk's defence that it 'abstracted away the boom option' during the evaluation does not stand.
Writing 'we think 13 to 16 FTE would be good' to a bidder who has 5 is not clarification — it's coaching
The Brussels Region awarded the Collecto night-taxi concession to newcomer Victor Cab, which had only 5 FTEs at offer opening, after the Region wrote that 13 to 16 FTEs 'would be a good approach' and even suggested how (article 60, interns, students) — the Council of State suspends because this falls far outside what article 48, §3 of the concession law allows.
The same fact can weigh on two award criteria — as long as those criteria measure genuinely different things
Alinea Interieurarchitectuur claimed it was 'sanctioned twice' for the Flemish House in London project because its lack of international experience cost points on both 'design team' and 'references' — the Council of State replies dryly that this is not a double sanction, but the same factor being relevant for two distinct assessments.
A photo of a bicycle is not a 'description of the equipment' — and with five defects in your bid you don't get a second chance
The City of Ghent excludes SGI Security from a EUR 3 million parking-control contract because of five cumulative defects in its bid (deviating walking routes, no planning tool, only a photo of a bike, only a photo of a uniform and contradictory hourly rates) — the Council of State confirms: a contracting authority is not obliged to plug every gap in a bid with a clarification request.
EUR 1,904 for one metre of pipe is obviously wrong — but 'we took the average of the competitors' is not a valid correction
The Province of Hainaut corrected one unit price in ENVISYS's bid from EUR 1,904.40/m to the average of the other bidders (EUR 26.30/m), bumping ENVISYS from fourth to first place — the Council of State suspends the award because the average of competitors does not prove what ENVISYS actually intended.
Opening half an hour too early costs FILBOIS eight lots — 'we always did it that way' is no longer a defence under the new Royal Decree
INTRADEL excludes long-time partner FILBOIS from all 8 lots for wood-waste processing because its facility opens and closes half an hour outside the specifications — the Council of State confirms: when the tender documents say 'essential', they mean essential, even if the same hours were accepted in previous years.
An irregular bidder gets only the extract on its own exclusion – not the award decision behind the winner
Heyrman-De Roeck is excluded for an unaccepted price justification and wants to scrutinise the price justification of the winner – who won with a price 100,000 euros higher – but the Council of State explains that the law of 17 June 2013 only entitles an irregular bidder to an extract setting out the grounds for its own exclusion, and that scrutiny of abnormally HIGH prices may anyway be more lenient than scrutiny of abnormally LOW prices.
A reference of 3.2 million euros for a commercial park does not count as a 'watercourse project' when only 299,000 euros were actually performed on the stream
T.R.B.A. submits references of 3.2 million euros (Estaimpuis) and 817,000 euros (Braine-le-Comte) for a selection criterion requiring '2 projects of 600,000 euros on non-navigable watercourses', but the Council of State reads the criterion as 'projects whose main object concerns works on watercourses' – and the Estaimpuis file (a commercial park where only 299,318 euros were actually performed on the Esperlion) does not meet that bar.
Negotiating below the €30k threshold is allowed, but not with one bidder alone — even if that bidder doesn't change its price
Woluwe-Saint-Pierre asked only the French winner whether it would deliver 36 instead of 24 anti-truck barriers at the same unit price, without asking PITAGONE the same — the Council of State suspends, even though the winner kept its price unchanged.
If your specifications ask for 'recent certificates from the manufacturer', you cannot later accept a supplier's own technical sheet
OTW required 'recent certifications' from the constructor for ZF gearbox oil, but awarded to WOLF OIL which only attached its own technical data sheet — the Council of State suspends with immediate execution: a contracting authority cannot loosen its own specifications after the fact.
'Correcting' a contradiction in your bid after you've seen the competitors' prices is not a material error — it breaks the equal-treatment principle
The Council of State suspends the re-award to ETS BERTRAND, because the city of Philippeville treated a contradiction in its bid (cover letter 'excl. VAT', form '€ incl. VAT' for the same figures) as a 'purely material error' — while the bidder only sent its 'clarification' after reading OCTA+'s prices in the first award decision.
'Proof of professional risks insurance' without amount or ceiling is no selection criterion — the Council suspends the award to Misanet and Atalian
The Belgian State had set 'proof of a professional risks insurance' as a financial selection criterion for the cleaning contract for the Immigration Service's closed centres and FITT housings, without any requirement on insured amount, ceiling or excess — the Council of State suspends the award because article 65 of the 2017 Award Royal Decree requires an appropriate level of requirement.
A remark in your offer about delivery times or revisions doesn't automatically make it irregular — provided the specifications allow it and your opponent can't link it to the award criterion
Ghent University awarded the €8.5 million Capture new-build to Cordeel-Imtech despite two remarks in their offer (longer delivery times for reinforcement plans and €100/hour from the third revision of production drawings); the Council of State rejects Wyckaert/SPIE's challenge because the specifications do not exclude the remarks and the applicants cannot directly link the alleged competitive advantage to the sole award criterion — price.
Once you require a bank declaration in the tender, you must enforce it — otherwise your award decision is empty motivation
The Council of State annuls the award to AGS Coussaert of lot 6 (diplomatic packing) of a five-year framework agreement of the Belgian Foreign Ministry: the award decision contained no motivation for accepting an offer without the bank declaration and without the ISPM15 and SEI/HPE certificates expressly required by the specifications, while the report simultaneously denied and confirmed that offer's regularity.
One signature short — and no second chance, even when a competitor got one
BUUR lost a contract worth nearly EUR 200,000 because its tender was signed by only one delegated director where the company's articles required two — and the Council ruled the awarding authority was under no obligation to allow regularisation, even though it had granted regularisation to another bidder at an earlier stage.
'Number of public clients in 2016' is not an award criterion — that is history
The Council of State suspends the award of a bailiff-services contract by the City of Andenne because three sub-criteria assess the bidder's existing client portfolio — data the bidder cannot influence and that say nothing about this specific contract.
RENEWI's price went up by EUR 113,000 after 'correction' — and the file does not say how
The Belgian Council of State suspends the award of a 4-year waste management contract to RENEWI because CHR Citadelle did motivate why a correction was needed but never explained how the price was actually recalculated — and without those calculation details, a 'rectification' of EUR 113,000 may in reality be a new price offer.
Demanding insurance of 3× your tender price is allowed — the '2× rule' from the directive only applies to turnover
The Belgian Council of State dismisses FALCO's appeal and confirms that a contracting authority may require bidders' professional liability insurance to cover at least 3× the tender amount — the proportionality rule that applies to minimum-turnover requirements (max 2× the estimated contract value) is not transposable to insurance guarantees.
One kilometre counts for the price criterion, 287 km do not — an open invitation to speculation
The Council of State suspends the award of a multi-year coach transport contract to TRANSIBUS because the price criterion of the city of Mons added only the unit price for a single kilometre, without taking into account the actual distances to be driven — a method that allows structurally different price structures and invites speculation.
An EUR 2,681 omission made the difference between winning and losing — and the Council of State sided with the bidder who reported it
The Council of State dismisses Bekaert's appeal against the award to Wyckaert for the construction of a police building, and confirms that the duty to report under article 81 of the Royal Decree of 18 April 2017 applies only to insurmountable defects in the contract documents — not to small omissions in the bill of quantities that a diligent bidder spots only when pricing.
A ESPD with only the odd pages scanned: a scanning slip, not grounds for exclusion
The Council of State suspends the award to Roularta because the City of Antwerp excluded Roto Smeets' bid for an incomplete ESPD (only odd pages scanned), although the scanning error resembles 'an inadvertent slip' and the equality of bidders was not at stake.
An unauthorised quantity change can't be 'corrected' — the bid must be excluded
The Council of State suspends the BIM's award to BDO because BDO had unilaterally reduced the estimated quantity in the inventory without the specifications authorising it — the contracting authority should have excluded the bid as substantially irregular instead of 'restoring' the original quantity under article 86.
Adding a correction note to your bid isn't post-opening regularisation — it's how the system is meant to work
The Council of State rejects VIABUILD's appeal: KRINKELS had attached an explanatory note 'Errors and/or omissions' to its bid from the moment of submission to correct certain items — a procedure expressly provided for in article 83, §2 of the 2011 Royal Decree, not a prohibited post-opening modification.
Submitting no ISO certificate? You don't need to prove why you couldn't get one
The Council of State rejects Sodexo's appeal: a tenderer who does not submit a quality certificate and instead provides 'equivalent measures' implicitly proves that the certificate could not be obtained in time — no separate 'negative' burden of proof is required.
A site visit for 'contract A' can't double as a site visit for 'contract B' — even if it's the same site
The Council of State suspends the award to Move & Play – MP Solutions of the redevelopment of the Scheutbos playground: the specifications required a site visit 'on pain of nullity', and the certificate the winner attached from an earlier visit for the parallel supplies contract does not satisfy that requirement for the works contract.
'A sound financial basis' is not a level of requirement — not even in a negotiated procedure
The Council of State suspends the award to Köse Cleaning of the cleaning of SNCB management buildings in Brussels because the contract notice fails to specify a level of requirement for several selection criteria — an obligation that applies fully to the negotiated procedure with publication too.
The price on the bid form and the price in the award report differed by 60,000 euros — and nobody explained why
The Council rejects Monument Vandekerckhove's appeal against the award to PPR-Vibed (€1,752,813), but rules that the duty to state reasons was breached because the contracting authority failed to explain why PPR-Vibed's price in the award report was suddenly €59,469 lower than at the opening session — and orders the Flemish Community to pay costs.
H is not H2 — anyone challenging a railway contract's accreditation category must not compare apples with pears
The Council rejects Strukton Rail's extreme-urgency appeal (€12,486,148.88) against the award of a railway contract to Putman Frères (€9,955,008.05) for finishing works at Klein-Eiland station: Strukton accuses Putman of having only category H accreditation instead of H2, but confuses 'overhead lines' (general H accreditation) with 'placing contact wires' (specific subcategory H2) and therefore fails to provide a usable calculation showing H2 was required for the whole contract.
Three documents may be requested after opening — provided they add nothing to what the bid already substantively committed to
The Council rejects the extreme-urgency appeal of THV IJzerpoort against the award of the Nieuwpoort storm-surge barrier (€50,108,070.70 incl. VAT, awarded to Herbosch-Kiere – Jan De Nul) over the post-opening request to other bidders for three documents (10-year LED-module warranty certificate, lift maintenance contract proposals, fire-detection certification): article 96, § 4 of the 2011 Award Royal Decree allows this where the documents bring no change to the bid or merely provide 'additional assurance' for commitments the bidder had already entered into by signing.
An item on the Synergrid list is a combination, not a single component — swap the driver and you're no longer on the list
The Council rejects Schreder's extreme-urgency application against Eandis' decision to declare all seven bids for LED street lighting (lots 1, 2 and 3) substantially irregular because the offered combination of luminaire, LED module and driver does not appear as such on the Synergrid 005 list — even though the separate driver is itself 005-certified.
Leaving an unsigned offer on e-procurement isn't a double submission — it's an abandoned half-finished project
Aswebo had uploaded documents to e-Tendering without ever signing the submission report, then joined THV Stadsbader-Aswebo for a 7-million-euro road works tender — Roads and Traffic excluded both offers as 'double bids', but the Council of State suspended that decision: art. 54 §2 requires a purpose-related test, not textual punishment.
If you ask one bidder to clarify an 'abnormal' offer, you must ask every bidder with the same ambiguity — selective questioning is unequal treatment
The Council of State suspends a Brussels Environment Institute award because only Oneliner was questioned about its 'abnormally high' translation volumes, while another selected bidder had explicitly not committed in its own offer either — selective questioning over an ambiguous tender clause is unequal treatment of bidders.
The same degressive percentage does not automatically apply to every award criterion — read where weighting per item exists
The Council of State rejects the extreme-urgency action of Moments Furniture, which argued that Vivalia should also have applied the degressive percentages (100%, 70%, 40%...) globally to the 'technical aspects' criterion of 45 points — whereas the specifications applied those percentages only item by item, because there was a separate weighting per item in column D of the inventory.
Want one project to count as a reference for every discipline? Say so in your application — not at the Council of State
The Council of State rejects the extreme-urgency action of an architectural firm that only afterwards claimed that its single restoration reference 't Schaliken was actually meant as a reference for architecture, technical studies and stability as well — while the city of Oudenburg had asked for four separate references in the call for applications and the firm's own application maintained that distinction.
Caught off guard by an unannounced tasting visit with no warm meal ready? Then your bid was the problem, not the contracting authority
The Council of State rejects Compass Group's extreme-urgency action against the award of a €4 million catering contract for the OCMW Aalst care homes to Sodexo, because the specifications expressly provided for an unannounced tasting visit at the production site stated in the bid — and the fact that Compass could only serve cold-line dishes at that visit is its own problem.
A publication error in the Belgian Official Gazette ('annual meeting' instead of 'board of directors') does not invalidate an offer — what counts is the actual mandate
The Council of State refuses to suspend the City of Aalst's award of 5.2 million euros of sewerage works to the joint venture Audenaert-Audebo, because an erroneously drafted Official Gazette extract does not undo the fact that Samuel Auquier's power of attorney had been granted — by the competent body, the board of directors of Audebo NV — long before the offer was filed.
25 references earn 10 out of 20 — when the contracting authority adds a hidden sub-criterion after the opening
The Council of State suspends the award of the design of the Terhagen community centre because AGB Rumst, after opening of the bids, split the fourth award criterion into two weighted sub-criteria — a split that gave Evolta (25 references) only 10/20 and the winner Signa (2 references) 9/20.
Two parallel procedures for the same contract? The Council sees through the urgency excuse
The Council of State suspends the award of a directional drilling under the Albert Canal to Van Vulpen because Eandis ran the same contract simultaneously through a mini-competition within its framework agreement and through a parallel negotiated procedure without prior publication with other companies — a setup that fatally undermines the 'imperative urgency' required by article 53, § 2, 1°, c) of the 15 June 2006 Procurement Act.
From 30/30 to 12/30 in the BAFO — when the contracting authority drops a hint and you ignore it
The Council of State refuses to suspend the award of the MIVB Erasmus metro depot (77.98 million euros) to THV CFE-Blaton, ruling that in a negotiated procedure with BAFO it is normal for scores to swing dramatically between the first offer and the final offer — particularly when one bidder responds to a mid-procedure signal from the contracting authority and the other does not.
A forgotten methodology document is not an 'arithmetic error' — even when the contracting authority already knows the content
The lowest bidder received 0/10 for technical centre maintenance because the methodology document was missing; the Council of State refuses to qualify this as a material error and confirms that regularisation would alter the offer — which is forbidden.
A contracting authority that secretly factors budget allocation into a methodology criterion rewrites its own specifications — and gets suspended
The Walloon Region scored the methodological award criteria partly on the basis of budget allocation and person-days that were nowhere announced as criteria in the specifications; the Council of State suspends the award because this modifies the criterion a posteriori or makes it unforeseeable.
Vlarema requires municipalities to conclude an agreement with a recycling centre — that creates no monopoly and does not displace the procurement law
ILVA awarded the collection of household textile waste for ten years exclusively to three recycling shops on the basis of an alleged 'statutory delegation' under the Flemish Vlarema regulation, but the Council of State suspends: neither the 2005 recognition decree nor article 5.1.7 of Vlarema confers an exclusive right on recycling centres — a public procurement procedure was required.
Asking for a €48,275 price supplement after the bid validity period? You may lose your awarded contract to a competitor
Devagro had won the demolition of the Veurne sugar factory for €574,887.92, but its registered request for a €48,275 price supplement prompted the contracting authority WVI to let all bidders revise their prices — and Aertssen took the contract at €610,625.42 while Devagro fell to second; the Council of State dismisses the challenge to that new award.
Two valid scoring errors in your offer count for nothing if the points gap remains too wide to close
Besix Park persuades the Council of State on two scoring errors — three wrongly deducted points on award criterion 1 and a possibly understated score on criterion 4 — but loses anyway, because even after correction 82.24 points cannot catch Apcoa's 90.
The specification asked for a birthday menu, the bid promised 'a culinary attention': one point less, contract lost
The Council of State rejects Compass Group's suspension request against OCMW Tervuren's award of lot 1 (hot meals) to ISS — at a difference of only 1.10 point between the two offers, small substantive deviations in the bid wording (a 'culinary attention' instead of the birthday menu required by the specifications, a thin treatment of ethnic diversity) fully justify why Compass loses two points on the quality criterion.
A live software demo is allowed — but the bidder cannot score for features that surface for the first time during that demo
The Council of State annuls the award to Randstad of the HYGEA temp-staffing contract because IDEA scored Randstad on two software features — integrated priority lists and cancellation up to 15 minutes before deployment — that were not in the bid itself but only emerged during the product demo a month after bid opening.
The lowest bidder loses a €105,982 school renovation because seven mandatory documents were missing — and the specifications offered no second chance
The Council of State dismisses the suspension request against the award of the renovation of the KA Berchem classrooms to Creative Resin Solutions for €105,982.08: the fact that the contracting authority allowed the winner to add a missing reference list but not Verboven-Reynders does not breach the principle of equal treatment — a bidder who omitted seven mandatory selection documents is not in a 'comparable situation' to one who only missed a single formality.
Letting a suspended contract run on — and refusing to file an administrative file 'for security reasons'? The Council of State suspends again, without any balance of interests
After the Council of State on 1 February 2016 suspended the award of the WTC III guarding contract to H-SECURITE, the Belgian State simply let the same service provider continue and refused to disclose any administrative file on the 'new' period — result: a second suspension in four weeks, with the applicant's facts accepted as proven and no vague 'safety of asylum seekers' balance to offset it.
Cutting five 'superfluous' sub-studies from the winning offer to make the price acceptable? That is not correcting a clerical error — that is rewriting the offer
The Council of State suspends the award of the design contract for the redevelopment of municipal buildings in Schoten to Jef Van Oevelen, because the municipality — without any formal procedure and without applying the same exercise to the other bidders — removed five 'unrequested' sub-studies (€96,075.95) from his lump-sum price, thereby lowering Van Oevelen's offer from €506,000 to €409,924 and elevating him to the top of the ranking against what the analysis report showed.
An email from the contracting authority does not amend the specifications — bidding below the minimum capacity remains a substantial irregularity
The Council of State rejects Stago BNL's extreme-urgency appeal against the award of four haemostasis analyzers to Siemens, because Stago offered devices with 260 and 100 analyses per hour where the specifications required 300 and 150 — and because a clarifying email from the hospital to Stago alone, which did not address capacity, could not override the specifications.
What was first 'insufficient' cannot suddenly become 'satisfactory' without explanation — in the absence of both a minimum threshold and a reasoned assessment, the selection collapses
The Council of State suspends the award of the design/build of a municipal school in Godarville to MIGNONE, because the municipality first found MIGNONE's reference lists insufficient, then without any visible assessment declared after additional information that they were 'satisfactory and sufficient', and in its written observations to the Council brought up — for the first time — five references, three of which had already been in the first list deemed insufficient.
Class 4 is in the specifications, class 3 is not — but you cannot pull such a minimum threshold out of a hat
The Council of State suspends the award to Groenservice of the installation of an artificial-turf football pitch for the municipality of Anderlecht, because the municipality had excluded the lowest bidder BVBA MAB on the basis of an unpublished minimum threshold — references had to exceed €500,000 — that appeared nowhere in the specifications or the notice.
The winner doesn't charge VAT — and the contracting authority believes it without a single document in the file
The Flemish Region awards a contract to a temporary partnership that doesn't charge VAT on most of its bid because of a supposed 'flat-rate agricultural scheme' — but that justification turns out to be factually wrong and rests on no document in the file.
A contracting authority that overrules its own jury must own the deviation — not rewrite the jury
After an initial suspension, the city of Sint-Niklaas gets a green light for a second award to the same bidder because the council may set aside its jury's advice on the second award criterion in a reasoned way — provided the new reasoning stands on its own.
Including a formal requirement in the specifications is not the same as making it essential
The fact that a contracting authority explicitly includes a formal requirement (Excel file, file naming convention) in its specifications does not automatically make a deviation a substantial irregularity — the authority retains discretion and may judge that comparability is not affected.
Two equal scores of 90/100, another 'concrete case' to break the tie — and the Council annuls: that's adding a new award criterion
The Council of State annuls the award to Luxtax for transporting the National Orchestra's instruments, because the contracting authority — faced with two tied scores of 90/100 — did not follow the procedure of article 101 §3 of the Placement Decree (request for improvement from the two tied bidders) but instead asked all four bidders for a price on a new monthly schedule and used that to build a second comparison table, which amounts to adding an award criterion during the procedure.
A 'se réserve le droit' clause is a faculty, not an obligation: the SRWT was not required to mistrust the guaranteed 81,000 km
The Council of State dismisses Michelin's annulment challenge against the awarding of lot 1 of the TEC bus tyre framework to Bridgestone, because the specifications clause 'la SRWT se réserve le droit de corriger ou écarter toute soumission faisant état d'un kilométrage garanti anormal' is a faculty and not an obligation, and Bridgestone's guaranteed 81,000 km — backed by the previous model's average of 79,132 km on the TEC network — is not manifestly unreasonable.
Missing 100 ml is a detail, missing 700 ml is an irregular bid — proportionality cuts both ways
The Council of State rejects SCA Hygiene Products' challenge to the award of a public welfare centre's nursing products framework to Ontex and rules that a 700 ml absorption shortfall against a 3,800 ml specification is materially different from a 100 ml shortfall — no breach of equal treatment.
You can't count the same 8 staff for two different personnel profiles — or you lose your selection
The Council of State dismisses K. Verstraete & Zoon's annulment appeal against the €6.5 million road-lighting contract awarded to nv VSE because Verstraete used the same 8 staff for both 'defects/breakdowns' and 'new construction', while the specifications required 29 separate profiles for lot 5.
Announcing four award criteria and quietly using three — voidable
The Council of State annuls the award to Alineater because the municipality of Aubange had announced four award criteria in its tender documents but completely ignored the fourth (energy references) when comparing bids — and admitted having done so.
Awarding points with 'value added' and 'value lost' without saying how many — does not hold up
The Council of State suspended the award to Sefac for tram lifting columns at De Lijn because the evaluation report assigns points using labels like 'value added', 'significant value lost' and 'very large value added' without ever explaining how many points each is worth.
Cancelling a procedure because the specifications are unclear is allowed — even if you weren't confused
The Council of State confirms: a contracting authority may decide not to award a lot and to relaunch with improved specifications, and a bidder saying 'but I understood it' is not enough to overturn that decision.
When your consultant becomes your supplier: that doesn't break the award — but only if your procurement design has already flattened the advantage
The Belgian National Office for Annual Leave first had A.O.S. (later Colliers) draw a dynamic-office concept for its new Rigoletto building, then awarded the furniture contract to that same Colliers, and the Council of State refuses to suspend: a prior-involvement situation under article 64 of the Royal Decree on Placement 2011 doesn't automatically force the buyer to formally verify the competitive advantage, provided the procurement architecture itself neutralizes that advantage.
'Best on two criteria beats best on one' is not a motivation — it's an arithmetic error
The Council of State suspends Infrabel's award to Schenck Process for 15 train weighing systems because the contracting authority simply added up two of three criteria against one, without weighing the actual gap between bids per criterion — while Lloyd's Register was €1.65 million cheaper.
Track public tenders?
Receive daily relevant tenders tailored to your business. Including AI summaries, competitive analysis and market intelligence.
This page shows all rulings of the Council of State (Belgium's supreme administrative court) on equal treatment in public procurement. Each ruling is summarized by TenderWolf in plain language, with a legal lesson and a practical question to ask yourself. View all rulings →